Re: [PATCH v8 02/27] sfc: add cxl support using new CXL API
From: Alejandro Lucero Palau <hidden>
Date: 2024-12-27 07:01:01
Also in:
linux-cxl
On 12/24/24 17:04, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
On Mon, 16 Dec 2024 16:10:17 +0000 [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
From: Alejandro Lucero <redacted> Add CXL initialization based on new CXL API for accel drivers and make it dependent on kernel CXL configuration. Signed-off-by: Alejandro Lucero <redacted> Reviewed-by: Martin Habets <redacted> Acked-by: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@gmail.com>Hi Alejandro A few minor comments inline. Assuming those are tidied up. Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>quoted
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..356d7a977e1c --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.c@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +/**************************************************************************** + * + * Driver for AMD network controllers and boards + * Copyright (C) 2024, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. + * + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it + * under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as published + * by the Free Software Foundation, incorporated herein by reference. + */ + +#include <cxl/cxl.h> +#include <cxl/pci.h> +#include <linux/pci.h> + +#include "net_driver.h" +#include "efx_cxl.h" + +#define EFX_CTPIO_BUFFER_SIZE SZ_256M + +int efx_cxl_init(struct efx_probe_data *probe_data) +{ + struct efx_nic *efx = &probe_data->efx; + struct pci_dev *pci_dev; + struct efx_cxl *cxl; + struct resource res; + u16 dvsec; + int rc; + + pci_dev = efx->pci_dev;
Trivial, but maybe put that one inline at the declaration above.
Sure.
quoted
+ probe_data->cxl_pio_initialised = false; + + dvsec = pci_find_dvsec_capability(pci_dev, PCI_VENDOR_ID_CXL, + CXL_DVSEC_PCIE_DEVICE); + if (!dvsec) + return 0; + + pci_dbg(pci_dev, "CXL_DVSEC_PCIE_DEVICE capability found\n"); + + cxl = kzalloc(sizeof(*cxl), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!cxl) + return -ENOMEM; + + cxl->cxlds = cxl_accel_state_create(&pci_dev->dev); + if (IS_ERR(cxl->cxlds)) { + pci_err(pci_dev, "CXL accel device state failed"); + rc = -ENOMEM; + goto err_state; + } + + cxl_set_dvsec(cxl->cxlds, dvsec); + cxl_set_serial(cxl->cxlds, pci_dev->dev.id); + + res = DEFINE_RES_MEM(0, EFX_CTPIO_BUFFER_SIZE); + if (cxl_set_resource(cxl->cxlds, res, CXL_RES_DPA)) { + pci_err(pci_dev, "cxl_set_resource DPA failed\n"); + rc = -EINVAL; + goto err_resource_set; + } + + res = DEFINE_RES_MEM_NAMED(0, EFX_CTPIO_BUFFER_SIZE, "ram"); + if (cxl_set_resource(cxl->cxlds, res, CXL_RES_RAM)) { + pci_err(pci_dev, "cxl_set_resource RAM failed\n"); + rc = -EINVAL; + goto err_resource_set; + } + + probe_data->cxl = cxl; + + return 0; + +err_resource_set: + kfree(cxl->cxlds); +err_state: + kfree(cxl); + return rc; +} + +void efx_cxl_exit(struct efx_probe_data *probe_data) +{ + if (probe_data->cxl) { + kfree(probe_data->cxl->cxlds); + kfree(probe_data->cxl); + } +} + +MODULE_IMPORT_NS("CXL");diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..90fa46bc94db --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.h@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */ +/**************************************************************************** + * Driver for AMD network controllers and boards + * Copyright (C) 2024, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. + * + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it + * under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as published + * by the Free Software Foundation, incorporated herein by reference. + */ + +#ifndef EFX_CXL_H +#define EFX_CXL_H + +struct efx_nic;Not sure why you need this one, but...
I forgot to remove it after using efx_probe_data instead of efx_nic. Good catch. I'll remove it.
struct efx_probe_data; struct cxl_dev_state; struct cxl_memdev; etc. are probably a good idea to avoid potential issues with include reorderings in the future.
Yes. Thanks
quoted
+ +struct efx_cxl { + struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds; + struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd; + struct cxl_root_decoder *cxlrd; + struct cxl_port *endpoint; + struct cxl_endpoint_decoder *cxled; + struct cxl_region *efx_region; + void __iomem *ctpio_cxl; +}; + +int efx_cxl_init(struct efx_probe_data *probe_data); +void efx_cxl_exit(struct efx_probe_data *probe_data); +#endif