Re: [PATCH 36/39] assorted variants of irqfd setup: convert to CLASS(fd)
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Date: 2024-08-10 03:53:20
Also in:
bpf, cgroups, kvm, linux-fsdevel
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Date: 2024-08-10 03:53:20
Also in:
bpf, cgroups, kvm, linux-fsdevel
On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 12:46:35PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 01:16:22AM GMT, viro@kernel.org wrote:quoted
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> in all of those failure exits prior to fdget() are plain returns and the only thing done after fdput() is (on failure exits) a kfree(),They could also be converted to: struct virqfd *virqfd __free(kfree) = NULL; and then direct returns are usable.
No. They could be converted, but kfree() is *not* the right destructor for that thing. This is a good example of the reasons why __cleanup should not be used blindly - this "oh, we'll just return, this object will be taken care of automagically" would better really take care of the object. Look for goto error_eventfd; in there...