Thread (134 messages) 134 messages, 10 authors, 2024-11-11

Re: [PATCH 16/39] convert __bpf_prog_get() to CLASS(fd, ...)

From: Andrii Nakryiko <hidden>
Date: 2024-08-06 21:08:39
Also in: bpf, cgroups, kvm, linux-fsdevel

On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 10:19 PM [off-list ref] wrote:
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Irregularity here is fdput() not in the same scope as fdget();
just fold ____bpf_prog_get() into its (only) caller and that's
it...

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
---
 kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 32 +++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
Folding makes total sense, the logic lgtm (though I find CLASS(fd,
f)(ufd) utterly non-intuitive naming-wise). Extra IS_ERR(prog) check
should be dropped though, see below.

Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index 3093bf2cc266..c5b252c0faa8 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -2407,18 +2407,6 @@ int bpf_prog_new_fd(struct bpf_prog *prog)
                                O_RDWR | O_CLOEXEC);
 }

-static struct bpf_prog *____bpf_prog_get(struct fd f)
-{
-       if (!fd_file(f))
-               return ERR_PTR(-EBADF);
-       if (fd_file(f)->f_op != &bpf_prog_fops) {
-               fdput(f);
-               return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
-       }
-
-       return fd_file(f)->private_data;
-}
-
 void bpf_prog_add(struct bpf_prog *prog, int i)
 {
        atomic64_add(i, &prog->aux->refcnt);
@@ -2474,20 +2462,22 @@ bool bpf_prog_get_ok(struct bpf_prog *prog,
 static struct bpf_prog *__bpf_prog_get(u32 ufd, enum bpf_prog_type *attach_type,
                                       bool attach_drv)
 {
-       struct fd f = fdget(ufd);
+       CLASS(fd, f)(ufd);
        struct bpf_prog *prog;

-       prog = ____bpf_prog_get(f);
-       if (IS_ERR(prog))
+       if (fd_empty(f))
+               return ERR_PTR(-EBADF);
+       if (fd_file(f)->f_op != &bpf_prog_fops)
+               return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+
+       prog = fd_file(f)->private_data;
+       if (IS_ERR(prog))       // can that actually happen?
no, it can't, private_data will always be a valid pointer, otherwise
that file would never be successfully created
                return prog;
-       if (!bpf_prog_get_ok(prog, attach_type, attach_drv)) {
-               prog = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
-               goto out;
-       }
+
+       if (!bpf_prog_get_ok(prog, attach_type, attach_drv))
+               return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);

        bpf_prog_inc(prog);
-out:
-       fdput(f);
        return prog;
 }

--
2.39.2
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help