Re: [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] Device Passthrough Considered Harmful?
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Date: 2024-07-28 11:18:53
Also in:
linux-cxl, linux-rdma
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Date: 2024-07-28 11:18:53
Also in:
linux-cxl, linux-rdma
Hi Dan, On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 05:16:08PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
Laurent Pinchart wrote:quoted
I know this is a topic proposed for the maintainers summit, but given the number of people who seem to have an opinion and be interested in dicussing it, would a session at LPC be a better candidate ? I don't expect the maintainer summit to invite all relevant experts from all subsystems, that would likely overflow the room. The downside of an LPC session is that it could easily turn into a heated stage fight, and there are probably also quite a few arguments that can't really be made in the open :-SA separate LPC session for a subsystem or set of subsystems to explore local passthrough policy makes sense, but that is not the primary motivation for also requesting a Maintainer Summit topic slot. The primary motivation is discussing the provenance and navigation of cross-subsystem NAKs especially in an environment where the lines between net, mem, and storage are increasingly blurry at the device level.
Would there be enough space at the maintainers' summit for all the relevant people to join the discussion ? -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart