Thread (126 messages) 126 messages, 19 authors, 2024-08-16

Re: [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] Device Passthrough Considered Harmful?

From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Date: 2024-07-25 19:43:19
Also in: linux-cxl, linux-rdma

On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 10:31:25PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
I don't think those are necessarily relevant examples, as far as device
pass-through goes. Vendors have many times reverted to proprietary ways,
and they still do, at least in the areas of the kernel I'm most active
in. I've seen first hand a large SoC vendor very close to opening a
significant part of their camera stack and changing their mind at the
last minute when they heard they could possibly merge their code through
a different subsystem with a pass-through blank cheque.
If someone came with a fully open source framework for (say) some
camera, with a passthrough kernel driver design, would you reject it
soley because it is passthrough based and you are scared that
something else will use it to do something not open source?

I wouldn't agree with that position, I think denying users useful open
source solutions out of fear is not what Linux should be doing.

Jason
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help