Re: [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] Device Passthrough Considered Harmful?
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Date: 2024-07-25 19:43:19
Also in:
linux-cxl, linux-rdma
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Date: 2024-07-25 19:43:19
Also in:
linux-cxl, linux-rdma
On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 10:31:25PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
I don't think those are necessarily relevant examples, as far as device pass-through goes. Vendors have many times reverted to proprietary ways, and they still do, at least in the areas of the kernel I'm most active in. I've seen first hand a large SoC vendor very close to opening a significant part of their camera stack and changing their mind at the last minute when they heard they could possibly merge their code through a different subsystem with a pass-through blank cheque.
If someone came with a fully open source framework for (say) some camera, with a passthrough kernel driver design, would you reject it soley because it is passthrough based and you are scared that something else will use it to do something not open source? I wouldn't agree with that position, I think denying users useful open source solutions out of fear is not what Linux should be doing. Jason