On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 03:02:13PM +0200, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote:

On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 2:23 PM Leon Romanovsky [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 11:26:38AM +0200, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote:

quoted

On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 10:02 PM Laurent Pinchart
[off-list ref] wrote:

<...>

quoted

It would be great to define what are the free software communities
here. Distros and final users are also "free software communities" and
they do not care about niche use cases covered by proprietary
software.

Are you certain about that?

As a user, and as an open source Distro developer I have a small hint.
But you could also ask users what they think about not being able to
use their notebook's cameras. The last time that I could not use some
basic hardware from a notebook with Linux was 20 years ago.

Lucky you, I still have consumer hardware (speaker) that doesn't work
with Linux, and even now, there is basic hardware in my current
laptop (HP docking station) that doesn't work reliably in Linux.

quoted

quoted

They only care (and should care) about normal workflows.

What is a normal workflow?
Does it mean that if user bought something very expensive he
should not be able to use it with free software, because his
usage is different from yours?

Thanks

It means that we should not block the standard usage for 99% of the
population just because 1% of the users cannot do something fancy with
their device.

Right, the problem is that in some areas the statistics slightly different.
99% population is blocked because 1% of the users don't need it and
don't think that it is "normal" flow.

Let me give you an example. When I buy a camera I want to be able to
do Video Conferencing and take some static photos of documents. I do
not care about: automatic makeup, AI generated background, unicorn
filters, eyes recentering... But we need to give a way to vendors to
implement those things closely, without the marketing differentiators,
vendors have zero incentive to invest in Linux, and that affects all
the population.

This challenge seems to be solved for GPUs. I am using my AMD GPU
freely and my nephew can install the amdgpu-pro proprietary user space
driver to play duke nukem (or whatever kids play now) at 2000 fps.

There are other other subsystems that allow vendor passthrough and
their ecosystem has not collapsed.

Yes, I completely agree with you on that.

Can we have some general guidance of what is acceptable? Can we define
together the "normal workflow" and focus on a *full* open source
implementation of that?

I don't think that is possible to define "normal workflow". Requirement
to have open-source counterpart to everything exposed through UAPI is a
valid one. I'm all for that.

Thanks

-- 
Ricardo Ribalda