Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm64: dts: S32G3: Introduce device tree for S32G-VNP-RDB3
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Date: 2024-03-15 22:41:16
Also in:
linux-clk, linux-devicetree, lkml
Quoting Wadim Mueller (2024-03-15 15:27:47)
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/nxp,s32-scmi-clock.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/nxp,s32-scmi-clock.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..240022c1f109 --- /dev/null +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/nxp,s32-scmi-clock.h@@ -0,0 +1,158 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause */ + +#ifndef __DT_BINDINGS_NXP_SCMI_CLOCK_S32_H +#define __DT_BINDINGS_NXP_SCMI_CLOCK_S32_H + +#define S32_SCMI_COMPLEX_CLK 0xFFFFFFFFU +#define S32_SCMI_NOT_IMPLEMENTED_CLK 0xFFFFFFFEU + +#define S32_SCMI_CLK_BASE_ID 0U +#define S32_SCMI_CLK(N) ((N) + S32_SCMI_CLK_BASE_ID) +#define S32_PLAT_SCMI_CLK(N) ((N) + S32_SCMI_PLAT_CLK_BASE_ID)
I think we've been recommending that scmi clk consumers simply list the number instead of making up defines for them.
+ +#define S32_SCMI_CLK_VERSION_MAJOR (1) +#define S32_SCMI_CLK_VERSION_MINOR (0)
Why is this part of the dt binding?