On 10/17/23 5:57 PM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:

On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 11:54 AM Daniel Borkmann [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On 10/17/23 5:38 PM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 11:00 AM Daniel Borkmann [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On 10/16/23 10:38 PM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:

quoted

On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 4:15 PM Jakub Kicinski [off-list ref] wrote:

[...]

quoted

quoted

FWIW please do not post another version this week (not that I think
that you would do that, but better safe than sorry. Last week the patch
bombs pushed the shared infra 24h+ behind the list..)

Not intending to.

Given bpf & kfuncs, please also Cc bpf@vger.kernel.org on future revisions
as not everyone on bpf list is subscribed to netdev.

I thought i did that, maybe it was in earlier patches. Do you want Cc
on everything or only on kfuncs? I am getting conflicting messages, do
you have to Cc bpf for kfuncs?
Example, attached from (some fs?) conference last month i think

This is extending capabilities of XDP and tc BPF prog types, so yes, the bpf
list should be in the loop.

Roger that, makes sense. So all patches or only kfunc ones?

Preferably the whole series as it's a bit hard to see some end to end
example on how it would be used if it's largely taken out of context.