On 10/17/23 5:38 PM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:

On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 11:00 AM Daniel Borkmann [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On 10/16/23 10:38 PM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:

quoted

On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 4:15 PM Jakub Kicinski [off-list ref] wrote:

[...]

quoted

quoted

FWIW please do not post another version this week (not that I think
that you would do that, but better safe than sorry. Last week the patch
bombs pushed the shared infra 24h+ behind the list..)

Not intending to.

Given bpf & kfuncs, please also Cc bpf@vger.kernel.org on future revisions
as not everyone on bpf list is subscribed to netdev.

I thought i did that, maybe it was in earlier patches. Do you want Cc
on everything or only on kfuncs? I am getting conflicting messages, do
you have to Cc bpf for kfuncs?
Example, attached from (some fs?) conference last month i think

This is extending capabilities of XDP and tc BPF prog types, so yes, the bpf
list should be in the loop.