Thread (91 messages) 91 messages, 9 authors, 2023-10-14

Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/3] Rust abstractions for network PHY drivers

From: Andrea Righi <hidden>
Date: 2023-10-09 14:21:35
Also in: rust-for-linux

On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 02:53:00PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 2:48 PM Andrew Lunn [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Any ideas?
That is `RETHUNK` and `X86_KERNEL_IBT`.

Since this will keep confusing people, I will make it a `depends on !`
as discussed in the past. I hope it is OK for e.g. Andrea.
Disabling RETHUNK or IBT is not acceptable for a general-purpose kernel.
If that constraint is introduced we either need to revert that patch
in the Ubuntu kernel or disable Rust support.

It would be nice to have a least something like
CONFIG_RUST_IS_BROKEN_BUT_IM_HAPPY, off by default, and have
`RUST_IS_BROKEN_BUT_IM_HAPPY || depends on !`.

-Andrea
Cheers,
Miguel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help