On Tue, 22 Aug 2023 17:21:35 +0800 Yunsheng Lin wrote:

quoted

.. we should also add a:

	WARN_ONCE(1, "misaligned DMA address, please report to netdev@");  

As the CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT seems to used widely in x86/arm/mips/powerpc,
I am not sure if we can really make the above assumption.

https://elixir.free-electrons.com/linux/v6.4-rc6/K/ident/CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT

Huh, it's actually used a lot less than I anticipated!

None of the x86/arm/mips/powerpc systems matter IMHO - the only _real_
risk is something we don't know about returning non-aligned addresses.

Unless we know about specific problems I'd suggest we took the simpler
path rather than complicating the design for systems which may not
exist.

Alex, do you know of any such cases? Some crazy swiotlb setting?
WDYT about this in general?