Thread (32 messages) 32 messages, 4 authors, 2023-08-29

Re: [PATCH net-next v7 2/6] page_pool: unify frag_count handling in page_pool_is_last_frag()

From: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
Date: 2023-08-16 11:32:17
Also in: lkml

On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 at 13:04, Yunsheng Lin [off-list ref] wrote:
Currently when page_pool_create() is called with
PP_FLAG_PAGE_FRAG flag, page_pool_alloc_pages() is only
allowed to be called under the below constraints:
1. page_pool_fragment_page() need to be called to setup
   page->pp_frag_count immediately.
2. page_pool_defrag_page() often need to be called to drain
   the page->pp_frag_count when there is no more user will
   be holding on to that page.

Those constraints exist in order to support a page to be
split into multi frags.

And those constraints have some overhead because of the
cache line dirtying/bouncing and atomic update.

Those constraints are unavoidable for case when we need a
page to be split into more than one frag, but there is also
case that we want to avoid the above constraints and their
overhead when a page can't be split as it can only hold a big
frag as requested by user, depending on different use cases:
use case 1: allocate page without page splitting.
use case 2: allocate page with page splitting.
use case 3: allocate page with or without page splitting
            depending on the frag size.

Currently page pool only provide page_pool_alloc_pages() and
page_pool_alloc_frag() API to enable the 1 & 2 separately,
so we can not use a combination of 1 & 2 to enable 3, it is
not possible yet because of the per page_pool flag
PP_FLAG_PAGE_FRAG.
I really think we are inventing problems to solve here.
What would be more useful here would be an example with numbers.  Most
of what you mention are true, but what % of the packets would split a
page in a way that the remaining part cant be used is unknown.  Do you
have a usecase in the hns3 driver?  Are there any numbers that justify
the change?

Thanks
/Ilias
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
So in order to allow allocating unsplit page without the
overhead of split page while still allow allocating split
page we need to remove the per page_pool flag in
page_pool_is_last_frag(), as best as I can think of, it seems
there are two methods as below:
1. Add per page flag/bit to indicate a page is split or
   not, which means we might need to update that flag/bit
   everytime the page is recycled, dirtying the cache line
   of 'struct page' for use case 1.
2. Unify the page->pp_frag_count handling for both split and
   unsplit page by assuming all pages in the page pool is split
   into a big frag initially.

As page pool already supports use case 1 without dirtying the
cache line of 'struct page' whenever a page is recyclable, we
need to support the above use case 3 with minimal overhead,
especially not adding any noticeable overhead for use case 1,
and we are already doing an optimization by not updating
pp_frag_count in page_pool_defrag_page() for the last frag
user, this patch chooses to unify the pp_frag_count handling
to support the above use case 3.

Signed-off-by: Yunsheng Lin <redacted>
CC: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
CC: Alexander Duyck <redacted>
CC: Liang Chen <redacted>
CC: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
---
 include/net/page_pool/helpers.h | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 net/core/page_pool.c            | 10 +++++-
 2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/page_pool/helpers.h b/include/net/page_pool/helpers.h
index cb18de55f239..19e8ba056868 100644
--- a/include/net/page_pool/helpers.h
+++ b/include/net/page_pool/helpers.h
@@ -134,7 +134,8 @@ inline enum dma_data_direction page_pool_get_dma_dir(struct page_pool *pool)
  */
 static inline void page_pool_fragment_page(struct page *page, long nr)
 {
-       atomic_long_set(&page->pp_frag_count, nr);
+       if (!PAGE_POOL_DMA_USE_PP_FRAG_COUNT)
+               atomic_long_set(&page->pp_frag_count, nr);
 }

 static inline long page_pool_defrag_page(struct page *page, long nr)
@@ -142,33 +143,54 @@ static inline long page_pool_defrag_page(struct page *page, long nr)
        long ret;

        /* If nr == pp_frag_count then we have cleared all remaining
-        * references to the page. No need to actually overwrite it, instead
-        * we can leave this to be overwritten by the calling function.
+        * references to the page:
+        * 1. 'n == 1': no need to actually overwrite it.
+        * 2. 'n != 1': overwrite it with one, which is the rare case
+        *              for frag draining.
         *
-        * The main advantage to doing this is that an atomic_read is
-        * generally a much cheaper operation than an atomic update,
-        * especially when dealing with a page that may be partitioned
-        * into only 2 or 3 pieces.
+        * The main advantage to doing this is that not only we avoid a
+        * atomic update, as an atomic_read is generally a much cheaper
+        * operation than an atomic update, especially when dealing with
+        * a page that may be partitioned into only 2 or 3 pieces; but
+        * also unify the frag and non-frag handling by ensuring all
+        * pages have been split into one big frag initially, and only
+        * overwrite it when the page is split into more than one frag.
         */
-       if (atomic_long_read(&page->pp_frag_count) == nr)
+       if (atomic_long_read(&page->pp_frag_count) == nr) {
+               /* As we have ensured nr is always one for constant case
+                * using the BUILD_BUG_ON(), only need to handle the
+                * non-constant case here for frag count draining, which
+                * is a rare case.
+                */
+               BUILD_BUG_ON(__builtin_constant_p(nr) && nr != 1);
+               if (!__builtin_constant_p(nr))
+                       atomic_long_set(&page->pp_frag_count, 1);
+
                return 0;
+       }

        ret = atomic_long_sub_return(nr, &page->pp_frag_count);
        WARN_ON(ret < 0);
+
+       /* We are the last user here too, reset frag count back to 1 to
+        * ensure all pages have been split into one big frag initially,
+        * this should be the rare case when the last two frag users call
+        * page_pool_defrag_page() currently.
+        */
+       if (unlikely(!ret))
+               atomic_long_set(&page->pp_frag_count, 1);
+
        return ret;
 }

-static inline bool page_pool_is_last_frag(struct page_pool *pool,
-                                         struct page *page)
+static inline bool page_pool_is_last_frag(struct page *page)
 {
        /* We assume we are the last frag user that is still holding
         * on to the page if:
-        * 1. Fragments aren't enabled.
-        * 2. We are running in 32-bit arch with 64-bit DMA.
-        * 3. page_pool_defrag_page() indicate we are the last user.
+        * 1. We are running in 32-bit arch with 64-bit DMA.
+        * 2. page_pool_defrag_page() indicate we are the last user.
         */
-       return !(pool->p.flags & PP_FLAG_PAGE_FRAG) ||
-              PAGE_POOL_DMA_USE_PP_FRAG_COUNT ||
+       return PAGE_POOL_DMA_USE_PP_FRAG_COUNT ||
               (page_pool_defrag_page(page, 1) == 0);
 }
@@ -194,7 +216,7 @@ static inline void page_pool_put_page(struct page_pool *pool,
         * allow registering MEM_TYPE_PAGE_POOL, but shield linker.
         */
 #ifdef CONFIG_PAGE_POOL
-       if (!page_pool_is_last_frag(pool, page))
+       if (!page_pool_is_last_frag(page))
                return;

        page_pool_put_defragged_page(pool, page, dma_sync_size, allow_direct);
diff --git a/net/core/page_pool.c b/net/core/page_pool.c
index 7d5f0512aa13..386e6d791e90 100644
--- a/net/core/page_pool.c
+++ b/net/core/page_pool.c
@@ -371,6 +371,14 @@ static void page_pool_set_pp_info(struct page_pool *pool,
 {
        page->pp = pool;
        page->pp_magic |= PP_SIGNATURE;
+
+       /* Ensuring all pages have been split into one big frag initially:
+        * page_pool_set_pp_info() is only called once for every page when it
+        * is allocated from the page allocator and page_pool_fragment_page()
+        * is dirtying the same cache line as the page->pp_magic above, so
+        * the overhead is negligible.
+        */
+       page_pool_fragment_page(page, 1);
        if (pool->p.init_callback)
                pool->p.init_callback(page, pool->p.init_arg);
 }
@@ -667,7 +675,7 @@ void page_pool_put_page_bulk(struct page_pool *pool, void **data,
                struct page *page = virt_to_head_page(data[i]);

                /* It is not the last user for the page frag case */
-               if (!page_pool_is_last_frag(pool, page))
+               if (!page_pool_is_last_frag(page))
                        continue;

                page = __page_pool_put_page(pool, page, -1, false);
--
2.33.0
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help