On Sun, 2023-06-11 at 11:36 +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:

Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 02:18:46PM CEST, arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com wrote:

quoted

From: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>

[...]

quoted

+int dpll_device_register(struct dpll_device *dpll, enum dpll_type type,
+			 const struct dpll_device_ops *ops, void *priv)
+{
+	struct dpll_device_registration *reg;
+	bool first_registration = false;
+
+	if (WARN_ON(!ops))
+		return -EINVAL;
+	if (WARN_ON(type < DPLL_TYPE_PPS || type > DPLL_TYPE_MAX))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	mutex_lock(&dpll_lock);
+	reg = dpll_device_registration_find(dpll, ops, priv);
+	if (reg) {
+		mutex_unlock(&dpll_lock);
+		return -EEXIST;
+	}
+
+	reg = kzalloc(sizeof(*reg), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!reg) {
+		mutex_unlock(&dpll_lock);
+		return -EEXIST;
+	}
+	reg->ops = ops;
+	reg->priv = priv;
+	dpll->type = type;
+	first_registration = list_empty(&dpll->registration_list);
+	list_add_tail(&reg->list, &dpll->registration_list);
+	if (!first_registration) {
+		mutex_unlock(&dpll_lock);
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	xa_set_mark(&dpll_device_xa, dpll->id, DPLL_REGISTERED);
+	mutex_unlock(&dpll_lock);
+	dpll_device_create_ntf(dpll);

This function is introduced in the next patch. Breaks bissection. Make
sure you can compile the code after every patch applied.

WRT, I think the easiest way to solve the above is adding the function
call in the next patch.

Cheers,

Paolo