On Jun 1, 2023, at 9:43 AM, Jakub Kicinski [off-list ref] wrote:

On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 16:34:08 +0000 Anjali Kulkarni wrote:

quoted

quoted

The code may have security implications, I really don't feel like I can
be the sole reviewer. There's a bunch of experts working at Oracle,
maybe you could get one of them to put their name on it? I can apply
the patches, I just want to be sure I'm not the _only_ reviewer.  

Thanks so much for your response. There is someone at Oracle who
looked at this some time ago and is familiar enough with this to
review the code - but he is not a kernel committer - he sends
occasional patches upstream which get committed - would it be ok if
he reviewed it along with you and then you could commit it? If you
know of someone from Oracle who could also potentially review it,
please let me know. 

I meant someone seasoned. IMHO one of the benefits of employing
upstream experts for corporation like Oracle should be that you
can lean on them for reviews:

$ git log --format='%ae' --author='Oracle' --since='2 years ago' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn
   811 willy@infradead.org
   312 rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk
    91 Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com
    60 vishal.moola@gmail.com

$ git log --format='%ae' --author='@oracle.com' --since='2 years ago' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -10
   451 chuck.lever@oracle.com
   154 michael.christie@oracle.com
   118 nick.alcock@oracle.com
    71 martin.petersen@oracle.com
    59 mike.kravetz@oracle.com
    58 sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com
    55 liam.howlett@oracle.com
    53 anand.jain@oracle.com
    32 dai.ngo@oracle.com
    32 allison.henderson@oracle.com

Thanks, let me check.
Anjali