Thread (17 messages) flat view 17 messages, 3 authors, 2021-09-30

Re: Lockup in phy_probe() for MDIO device (Broadcom's switch)

From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Date: 2021-09-30 13:54:20

On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 03:42:38PM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
On 30.09.2021 15:07, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 02:51:40PM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
quoted
On 30.09.2021 14:30, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
quoted
quoted
It's actually OpenWrt's downstream swconfig-based b53 driver that
matches this device.

I'm confused as downstream b53_mdio.c calls phy_driver_register(). Why
does it match MDIO device then? I thought MDIO devices should be
matches only with drivers using mdio_driver_register().
Note that I've no idea what he swconfig-based b53 driver looks like,
I don't have the source for that to hand.

If it calls phy_driver_register(), then it is registering a driver for
a MDIO device wrapped in a struct phy_device. If this driver has a
.of_match_table member set, then this is wrong - the basic rule is

	PHY drivers must never match using DT compatibles.

because this is exactly what will occur - it bypasses the check that
the mdio_device being matched is in fact wrapped by a struct phy_device,
and we will access members of the non-existent phy_device, including
the "uninitialised" mutex.

If the swconfig-based b53 driver does want to bind to a phy_device based
DT node, then it needs to match using either a custom .match_phy_device
method in the PHY driver, or it needs to match using the PHY IDs.
Sorry, I should have linked downstream b53_mdio.c . It's:
https://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/openwrt.git;a=blob;f=target/linux/generic/files/drivers/net/phy/b53/b53_mdio.c;h=98cdbffe73c7354f4401389dfcc96014bff62588;hb=HEAD
Yes, I just found a version of the driver
quoted
You can see that is *uses* of_match_table.

What about refusing bugged drivers like above b53 with something like:
That will break all the MDIO based DSA and other non-PHY drivers,
sorry.

I suppose we could detect if the driver has the MDIO_DEVICE_IS_PHY flag
set, and reject any device that does not have MDIO_DEVICE_IS_PHY set:
diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c b/drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c
index 53f034fc2ef7..7bc06126ce10 100644
--- a/drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c
@@ -939,6 +939,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mdiobus_modify);
  static int mdio_bus_match(struct device *dev, struct device_driver *drv)
  {
  	struct mdio_device *mdio = to_mdio_device(dev);
+	struct mdio_driver *mdiodrv = to_mdio_driver(drv);
+
+	/* Both the driver and device must type-match */
+	if (!(mdiodrv->mdiodrv.flags & MDIO_DEVICE_IS_PHY) ==
+	    !(mdio->flags & MDIO_DEVICE_FLAG_PHY))
+		return 0;
  	if (of_driver_match_device(dev, drv))
  		return 1;
In OpenWrt & bugged b53 case we have:
1. Device without MDIO_DEVICE_FLAG_PHY
2. Driver with MDIO_DEVICE_IS_PHY

I think the logic should be to return 0 on mismatch (reverted).
I assume you mean the test should've been != not == - then yes, you
are absolutely correct. Sorry, I'm still not over a cold.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help