Re: Lockup in phy_probe() for MDIO device (Broadcom's switch)
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Date: 2021-09-30 13:54:20
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 03:42:38PM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
On 30.09.2021 15:07, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:quoted
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 02:51:40PM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:quoted
On 30.09.2021 14:30, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:quoted
quoted
It's actually OpenWrt's downstream swconfig-based b53 driver that matches this device. I'm confused as downstream b53_mdio.c calls phy_driver_register(). Why does it match MDIO device then? I thought MDIO devices should be matches only with drivers using mdio_driver_register().Note that I've no idea what he swconfig-based b53 driver looks like, I don't have the source for that to hand. If it calls phy_driver_register(), then it is registering a driver for a MDIO device wrapped in a struct phy_device. If this driver has a .of_match_table member set, then this is wrong - the basic rule is PHY drivers must never match using DT compatibles. because this is exactly what will occur - it bypasses the check that the mdio_device being matched is in fact wrapped by a struct phy_device, and we will access members of the non-existent phy_device, including the "uninitialised" mutex. If the swconfig-based b53 driver does want to bind to a phy_device based DT node, then it needs to match using either a custom .match_phy_device method in the PHY driver, or it needs to match using the PHY IDs.Sorry, I should have linked downstream b53_mdio.c . It's: https://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/openwrt.git;a=blob;f=target/linux/generic/files/drivers/net/phy/b53/b53_mdio.c;h=98cdbffe73c7354f4401389dfcc96014bff62588;hb=HEADYes, I just found a version of the driverquoted
You can see that is *uses* of_match_table. What about refusing bugged drivers like above b53 with something like:That will break all the MDIO based DSA and other non-PHY drivers, sorry. I suppose we could detect if the driver has the MDIO_DEVICE_IS_PHY flag set, and reject any device that does not have MDIO_DEVICE_IS_PHY set:diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c b/drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c index 53f034fc2ef7..7bc06126ce10 100644 --- a/drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c +++ b/drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c@@ -939,6 +939,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mdiobus_modify); static int mdio_bus_match(struct device *dev, struct device_driver *drv) { struct mdio_device *mdio = to_mdio_device(dev); + struct mdio_driver *mdiodrv = to_mdio_driver(drv); + + /* Both the driver and device must type-match */ + if (!(mdiodrv->mdiodrv.flags & MDIO_DEVICE_IS_PHY) == + !(mdio->flags & MDIO_DEVICE_FLAG_PHY)) + return 0; if (of_driver_match_device(dev, drv)) return 1;In OpenWrt & bugged b53 case we have: 1. Device without MDIO_DEVICE_FLAG_PHY 2. Driver with MDIO_DEVICE_IS_PHY I think the logic should be to return 0 on mismatch (reverted).
I assume you mean the test should've been != not == - then yes, you are absolutely correct. Sorry, I'm still not over a cold. -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!