[PATCH net-next 00/13] Add NXP SJA1110 support to the sja1105 DSA driver · Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> · 2021-05-24
[PATCH net-next 01/13] net: dsa: sja1105: be compatible with "ethernet-ports" OF node name · Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> · 2021-05-24
Re: [PATCH net-next 01/13] net: dsa: sja1105: be compatible with "ethernet-ports" OF node name · Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> · 2021-05-25
[PATCH net-next 02/13] net: dsa: sja1105: allow SGMII PCS configuration to be per port · Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> · 2021-05-24
Re: [PATCH net-next 02/13] net: dsa: sja1105: allow SGMII PCS configuration to be per port · Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> · 2021-05-25
Re: [PATCH net-next 02/13] net: dsa: sja1105: allow SGMII PCS configuration to be per port · Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> · 2021-05-26
[PATCH net-next 04/13] net: dsa: sja1105: cache the phy-mode port property · Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> · 2021-05-24
Re: [PATCH net-next 04/13] net: dsa: sja1105: cache the phy-mode port property · Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> · 2021-05-25
[PATCH net-next 03/13] net: dsa: sja1105: the 0x1F0000 SGMII "base address" is actually MDIO_MMD_VEND2 · Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> · 2021-05-24
Re: [PATCH net-next 03/13] net: dsa: sja1105: the 0x1F0000 SGMII "base address" is actually MDIO_MMD_VEND2 · Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> · 2021-05-25
Re: [PATCH net-next 03/13] net: dsa: sja1105: the 0x1F0000 SGMII "base address" is actually MDIO_MMD_VEND2 · Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> · 2021-05-25
Re: [PATCH net-next 03/13] net: dsa: sja1105: the 0x1F0000 SGMII "base address" is actually MDIO_MMD_VEND2 · Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> · 2021-05-25
[PATCH net-next 06/13] net: dsa: sja1105: add a translation table for port speeds · Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> · 2021-05-24
[PATCH net-next 05/13] net: dsa: sja1105: add a PHY interface type compatibility matrix · Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> · 2021-05-24
Re: [PATCH net-next 05/13] net: dsa: sja1105: add a PHY interface type compatibility matrix · Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> · 2021-05-25
Re: [PATCH net-next 05/13] net: dsa: sja1105: add a PHY interface type compatibility matrix · Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> · 2021-05-26
[PATCH net-next 08/13] net: dsa: sja1105: some table entries are always present when read dynamically · Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> · 2021-05-24
[PATCH net-next 07/13] net: dsa: sja1105: always keep RGMII ports in the MAC role · Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> · 2021-05-24
Re: [PATCH net-next 07/13] net: dsa: sja1105: always keep RGMII ports in the MAC role · Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> · 2021-05-25
[PATCH net-next 09/13] dt-bindings: net: dsa: sja1105: add compatible strings for SJA1110 · Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> · 2021-05-24
Re: [PATCH net-next 09/13] dt-bindings: net: dsa: sja1105: add compatible strings for SJA1110 · Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> · 2021-05-25
Re: [PATCH net-next 09/13] dt-bindings: net: dsa: sja1105: add compatible strings for SJA1110 · Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> · 2021-05-25
[PATCH net-next 11/13] net: dsa: sja1105: register the MDIO buses for 100base-T1 and 100base-TX · Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> · 2021-05-24
Re: [PATCH net-next 11/13] net: dsa: sja1105: register the MDIO buses for 100base-T1 and 100base-TX · Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> · 2021-05-25
Re: [PATCH net-next 11/13] net: dsa: sja1105: register the MDIO buses for 100base-T1 and 100base-TX · Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> · 2021-05-25
Re: [PATCH net-next 11/13] net: dsa: sja1105: register the MDIO buses for 100base-T1 and 100base-TX · Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> · 2021-05-25
Re: [PATCH net-next 11/13] net: dsa: sja1105: register the MDIO buses for 100base-T1 and 100base-TX · Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> · 2021-05-25
Re: [PATCH net-next 11/13] net: dsa: sja1105: register the MDIO buses for 100base-T1 and 100base-TX · Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> · 2021-05-25
Re: [PATCH net-next 11/13] net: dsa: sja1105: register the MDIO buses for 100base-T1 and 100base-TX · Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> · 2021-05-26
Re: [PATCH net-next 11/13] net: dsa: sja1105: register the MDIO buses for 100base-T1 and 100base-TX · Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> · 2021-05-25
[PATCH net-next 10/13] net: dsa: sja1105: add support for the SJA1110 switch family · Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> · 2021-05-24
[PATCH net-next 13/13] net: dsa: sja1105: add support for the SJA1110 SGMII/2500base-x PCS · Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> · 2021-05-24
Re: [PATCH net-next 13/13] net: dsa: sja1105: add support for the SJA1110 SGMII/2500base-x PCS · Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> · 2021-05-25
Re: [PATCH net-next 13/13] net: dsa: sja1105: add support for the SJA1110 SGMII/2500base-x PCS · Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> · 2021-05-25
[PATCH net-next 12/13] net: dsa: sja1105: expose the SGMII PCS as an mdio_device · Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> · 2021-05-24
Re: [PATCH net-next 12/13] net: dsa: sja1105: expose the SGMII PCS as an mdio_device · Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> · 2021-05-25
Re: [PATCH net-next 12/13] net: dsa: sja1105: expose the SGMII PCS as an mdio_device · Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> · 2021-05-25
Re: [PATCH net-next 12/13] net: dsa: sja1105: expose the SGMII PCS as an mdio_device · Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> · 2021-05-25
Re: [PATCH net-next 00/13] Add NXP SJA1110 support to the sja1105 DSA driver · Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> · 2021-05-25
Re: [PATCH net-next 00/13] Add NXP SJA1110 support to the sja1105 DSA driver · Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> · 2021-05-26

Re: [PATCH net-next 11/13] net: dsa: sja1105: register the MDIO buses for 100base-T1 and 100base-TX

From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Date: 2021-05-25 13:43:20

Just to be clear, what is your suggestion for this? I am not a great fan
of 2 internal MDIO buses, but as mentioned, the PHY access procedure is
different for the 100base-TX and the 100base-T1 PHYs.

Do what the mv88e6xxx driver does. Have two busses, but do not put
them into a container node. You then avoid issues with the yaml
validater and not need the reg values etc.

	  Andrew

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help