Re: [Patch bpf-next v2 2/9] sock: introduce sk_prot->update_proto()
From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Date: 2021-03-10 06:34:37
Also in:
bpf
Cong Wang wrote:
On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 5:55 PM John Fastabend [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
[...]
quoted
quoted
// tcp_bpf_prots->unhash == sock_map_unhash sk_psock_restore_proto(); // Now tcp_bpf_prots->unhash is inet_unhash ... sk_psock_update_proto(); // sk->sk_proto is now tcp_bpf_prots again, // so its ->unhash now is inet_unhash // but it should be sock_map_unhash hereRight, we can fix this on the TLS side. I'll push a fix shortly.Are you still working on this? If kTLS still needs it, then we can have something like this:
Testing a fix now I will flush it out tomorrow. The below is not really correct either it just moves the issue so it only impacts TLS.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/include/linux/skmsg.h b/include/linux/skmsg.h index 8edbbf5f2f93..5eb617df7f48 100644 --- a/include/linux/skmsg.h +++ b/include/linux/skmsg.h@@ -349,8 +349,8 @@ static inline void sk_psock_update_proto(struct sock *sk, static inline void sk_psock_restore_proto(struct sock *sk, struct sk_psock *psock) { - sk->sk_prot->unhash = psock->saved_unhash; if (inet_csk_has_ulp(sk)) { + sk->sk_prot->unhash = psock->saved_unhash; tcp_update_ulp(sk, psock->sk_proto, psock->saved_write_space); } else { sk->sk_write_space = psock->saved_write_space;Thanks.