On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 03:13:03PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
quoted
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_stp.c b/net/bridge/br_stp.c
index 86b5e05d3f21..3dafb6143cff 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_stp.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_stp.c
@@ -639,6 +639,19 @@ int br_set_ageing_time(struct net_bridge *br, clock_t ageing_time)
return 0;
}
+clock_t br_get_ageing_time(struct net_device *br_dev)
+{
+ struct net_bridge *br;
+
+ if (!netif_is_bridge_master(br_dev))
+ return 0;
+
+ br = netdev_priv(br_dev);
+
+ return jiffies_to_clock_t(br->ageing_time);
Don't you want an ASSERT_RTNL() in this function as well?
Hmm, I'm not sure. I don't think I'm accessing anything that is under
the protection of the rtnl_mutex. If anything, the ageing time is
protected by the "bridge lock", but I don't think there's much of an
issue if I read an unsigned int while not holding it.