Thread (219 messages) flat view 219 messages, 14 authors, 2021-02-05

Re: [PATCHv15 bpf-next 1/6] bpf: run devmap xdp_prog on flush instead of bulk enqueue

From: Hangbin Liu <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-21 04:05:16
Also in: bpf

Hi Maciej,
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 11:42:38PM +0100, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
quoted
+static int dev_map_bpf_prog_run(struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog,
+				struct xdp_frame **frames, int n,
+				struct net_device *dev)
+{
+	struct xdp_txq_info txq = { .dev = dev };
+	struct xdp_buff xdp;
+	int i, nframes = 0;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
+		struct xdp_frame *xdpf = frames[i];
+		u32 act;
+		int err;
+
+		xdp_convert_frame_to_buff(xdpf, &xdp);
+		xdp.txq = &txq;
+
+		act = bpf_prog_run_xdp(xdp_prog, &xdp);
+		switch (act) {
+		case XDP_PASS:
+			err = xdp_update_frame_from_buff(&xdp, xdpf);
Bump on John's question.
Hi Jesper, would you please help answer John's question?
quoted
 
-	sent = dev->netdev_ops->ndo_xdp_xmit(dev, bq->count, bq->q, flags);
+	/* Init sent to cnt in case there is no xdp_prog */
+	sent = cnt;
+	if (bq->xdp_prog) {
+		sent = dev_map_bpf_prog_run(bq->xdp_prog, bq->q, cnt, dev);
+		if (!sent)
+			goto out;
Sorry, but 'sent' is a bit confusing to me, actual sending happens below
via ndo_xdp_xmit, right? This hook will not actually send frames.
Can we do a subtle change to have it in separate variable 'to_send' ?
Makes sense to me.
Although I'm a huge goto advocate, I feel like this particular usage could
be simplified. Not sure why we had that in first place.

I gave a shot at rewriting/refactoring whole bq_xmit_all and I feel like
it's more readable. I introduced 'to_send' variable and got rid of 'error'
label.

Thoughts?

I might have missed something, though.

static void bq_xmit_all(struct xdp_dev_bulk_queue *bq, u32 flags)
{
	struct net_device *dev = bq->dev;
	unsigned int cnt = bq->count;
	int drops = 0, err = 0;
	int to_send = 0;
The to_send also need to init to cnt.
	int sent = cnt;
	int i;

	if (unlikely(!cnt))
		return;

	for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++) {
		struct xdp_frame *xdpf = bq->q[i];

		prefetch(xdpf);
	}

	if (bq->xdp_prog) {
		to_send = dev_map_bpf_prog_run(bq->xdp_prog, bq->q, cnt, dev);
		if (!to_send) {
			sent = 0;
			goto out;
		}
	}

	drops = cnt - to_send;
This line could move in to the xdp_prog brackets to save time when no xdp_prog.

	if (bq->xdp_prog) {
		to_send = ...
		if (!to_send) {
			...
		}
		drops = cnt - to_send;
	}
	sent = dev->netdev_ops->ndo_xdp_xmit(dev, to_send, bq->q, flags);
If we don't have xdp_prog, the to_send should be cnt.
	if (sent < 0) {
		err = sent;
		sent = 0;

		/* If ndo_xdp_xmit fails with an errno, no frames have been
		 * xmit'ed and it's our responsibility to them free all.
		 */
		for (i = 0; i < cnt - drops; i++) {
			struct xdp_frame *xdpf = bq->q[i];

			xdp_return_frame_rx_napi(xdpf);
		}
	}
out:
	drops = cnt - sent;
	bq->count = 0;

	trace_xdp_devmap_xmit(bq->dev_rx, dev, sent, drops, err);
	bq->dev_rx = NULL;
	bq->xdp_prog = NULL;
	__list_del_clearprev(&bq->flush_node);

	return;
}
Thanks for your code, looks much clear now.

Hangbin
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help