Re: [pull request][net-next V10 00/14] Add mlx5 subfunction support
From: Edwin Peer <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-25 18:37:23
Also in:
linux-rdma
Attachments
- smime.p7s [application/pkcs7-signature] 4160 bytes
From: Edwin Peer <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-25 18:37:23
Also in:
linux-rdma
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 2:57 AM Parav Pandit [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Apologies for the tardy question out of left field, but I've been thinking about this some more. If I recall, the primary motivation for this was a means to effectively address more VFs? But, why can't the device simply expose more bus numbers?Several weeks back, Jason already answered this VF scaling question from you at discussion [1]. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20201216023928.GG552508@nvidia.com/ (local)
True, although I didn't really consider the full cost argument at the time because the core answer was "They can't", however, the fact is, PCI can. Regards, Edwin Peer