On Monday, 19 October 2020, 19:46:17 CEST, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 07:24:34PM +0200, Christian Eggers wrote:
quoted
static int ksz9477_ptp_enable(struct ptp_clock_info *ptp, struct
ptp_clock_request *req, int on) {
- return -ENOTTY;
+ struct ksz_device *dev = container_of(ptp, struct ksz_device, ptp_caps);
+ int ret;
+
+ switch (req->type) {
+ case PTP_CLK_REQ_PPS:
+ mutex_lock(&dev->ptp_mutex);
+ ret = ksz9477_ptp_enable_pps(dev, on);
+ mutex_unlock(&dev->ptp_mutex);
+ return ret;
+ default:
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
}
Nope, this is not what you're looking for. Please implement
PTP_CLK_REQ_PEROUT.
Are you sure? I have implemented both (see patch 9/9). I cannot see that the
PTP_ENABLE_PPS(2) ioctls are translated into PTP_CLK_REQ_PEROUT.
PTP_CLK_REQ_PEROUT is also called in pps_enable_store().
regards
Christian