Thread (44 messages) flat view 44 messages, 4 authors, 2019-10-21

Re: [PATCH net-next 03/16] net: dsa: use ports list in dsa_to_port

From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Date: 2019-10-21 02:38:39
Also in: lkml


On 10/19/2019 8:19 PM, Vivien Didelot wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Use the new ports list instead of accessing the dsa_switch array
of ports in the dsa_to_port helper.

Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <redacted>
---
 include/net/dsa.h | 9 ++++++++-
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/net/dsa.h b/include/net/dsa.h
index 6ff6dfcdc61d..938de9518c61 100644
--- a/include/net/dsa.h
+++ b/include/net/dsa.h
@@ -285,7 +285,14 @@ struct dsa_switch {
 
 static inline struct dsa_port *dsa_to_port(struct dsa_switch *ds, int p)
 {
-	return &ds->ports[p];
+	struct dsa_switch_tree *dst = ds->dst;
+	struct dsa_port *dp;
I would initialize this to NULL and always return dp
+
+	list_for_each_entry(dp, &dst->ports, list)
+		if (dp->ds == ds && dp->index == p)
+			return dp;
and do a break here, but this is strictly identical to your code, so it
boils down to a matter of preference.

Do you possibly need to use list_for_ech_entry_safe() here, especially
for the code paths that deal with the unregistering of a switch/switch
fabric? That also raises the question of locking as well, which can be
punted on the caller if that is appropriate.

Other than that:

Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
-- 
Florian
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help