Thread (23 messages) 23 messages, 4 authors, 2018-11-01

RE: [RFC PATCH 4/4] ixgbe: add support for extended PHC gettime

From: "Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Date: 2018-11-01 07:08:51
Also in: intel-wired-lan

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Cochran [mailto:richardcochran@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2018 2:17 PM
To: Miroslav Lichvar <redacted>
Cc: Keller, Jacob E <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>; netdev@vger.kernel.org; intel-wired-
lan@lists.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] ixgbe: add support for extended PHC gettime

On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 03:49:35PM +0100, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
quoted
How about separating the PHC timestamp from the ptp_system_timestamp
structure and use NULL to indicate we don't want to read the system
clock? A gettimex64(ptp, ts, NULL) call would be equal to
gettime64(ptp, ts).
Doesn't sound too bad to me.

Thanks,
Richard
Yep, this seems fine to me as well.

Regards,
Jake
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help