RE: [RFC PATCH 4/4] ixgbe: add support for extended PHC gettime
From: "Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Date: 2018-11-01 07:08:51
Also in:
intel-wired-lan
From: "Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Date: 2018-11-01 07:08:51
Also in:
intel-wired-lan
-----Original Message----- From: Richard Cochran [mailto:richardcochran@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2018 2:17 PM To: Miroslav Lichvar <redacted> Cc: Keller, Jacob E <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>; netdev@vger.kernel.org; intel-wired- lan@lists.osuosl.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] ixgbe: add support for extended PHC gettime On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 03:49:35PM +0100, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:quoted
How about separating the PHC timestamp from the ptp_system_timestamp structure and use NULL to indicate we don't want to read the system clock? A gettimex64(ptp, ts, NULL) call would be equal to gettime64(ptp, ts).Doesn't sound too bad to me. Thanks, Richard
Yep, this seems fine to me as well. Regards, Jake