RE: [RFC PATCH 4/4] ixgbe: add support for extended PHC gettime
From: "Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Date: 2018-11-01 01:54:12
Also in:
intel-wired-lan
From: "Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Date: 2018-11-01 01:54:12
Also in:
intel-wired-lan
-----Original Message----- From: Richard Cochran [mailto:richardcochran@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2018 7:40 AM To: Miroslav Lichvar <redacted> Cc: Keller, Jacob E <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>; netdev@vger.kernel.org; intel-wired- lan@lists.osuosl.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] ixgbe: add support for extended PHC gettime On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 02:31:09PM +0100, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:quoted
I think there could be a flag in ptp_system_timestamp, or a parameter of gettimex64(), which would enable/disable reading of the system clock.I'm not a fan of functions that change their behavior based on flags in their input parameters. Thanks, Richard
Neither am I. I do however want to find a solution that avoids having drivers needlessly duplicate almost the same functionality. Thanks, Jake