Re: [PATCH 03/10] net: ezchip: nps_enet: Fix platform_get_irq's error checking
flat view
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2017-12-04 16:34:54
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, lkml
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 16:24:47 +0000
On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 11:20:49AM -0500, David Miller wrote:quoted
From: Arvind Yadav <redacted> Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2017 00:56:15 +0530quoted
The platform_get_irq() function returns negative if an error occurs. zero or positive number on success. platform_get_irq() error checking for zero is not correct. And remove unnecessary check for free_netdev(). Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <redacted> --- drivers/net/ethernet/ezchip/nps_enet.c | 7 +++---- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ezchip/nps_enet.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ezchip/nps_enet.c index 659f1ad..82dc6d0 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ezchip/nps_enet.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ezchip/nps_enet.c@@ -623,9 +623,9 @@ static s32 nps_enet_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) /* Get IRQ number */ priv->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); - if (!priv->irq) { + if (priv->irq <= 0) { dev_err(dev, "failed to retrieve <irq Rx-Tx> value from device tree\n"); - err = -ENODEV; + err = priv->irq ? priv->irq : -ENODEV;If platform_get_irq() returns "zero or positive number on success" then this test is wrong and should be "if (priv->irq < 0)" Also, this series is a mix of different kinds of changes. Please separate out the platform IRQ error checking and just submit exactly those changes as a patch series. The other bug fixes should be submitted outside of those changes since they are unrelated.The issue of whether IRQ 0 is valid or not has been covered several times by Linus, and the result is that it is deemed by Linus that IRQ 0 is not a valid interrupt.
Then either platform_get_irq() as defined or this commit message (or both) are wrong.