Re: [PATCH v2 14/35] nds32: System calls handling
From: Vincent Chen <hidden>
Date: 2017-11-28 02:18:25
Also in:
linux-arch, linux-devicetree, linux-serial, lkml
2017-11-27 22:46 GMT+08:00 Arnd Bergmann [off-list ref]:
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Greentime Hu [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
diff --git a/arch/nds32/include/asm/syscalls.h b/arch/nds32/include/asm/syscalls.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000..741ccdc --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/nds32/include/asm/syscalls.h@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +/* + * Copyright (C) 2005-2017 Andes Technology Corporation + * + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as + * published by the Free Software Foundation. + * + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the + * GNU General Public License for more details. + * + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License + * along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. + */ + +#ifndef __ASM_NDS32_SYSCALLS_H +#define __ASM_NDS32_SYSCALLS_H + +int sys_cacheflush(unsigned long addr, unsigned long len, unsigned int op); +long sys_fadvise64_64_wrapper(int fd, int advice, loff_t offset, loff_t len); +asmlinkage int sys_syscall(void); +asmlinkage int sys_rt_sigreturn_wrapper(void);You mentioned that sys_syscall() should be removed in this version.
Sorry, I will remove it in next version patch.
By convention, all syscall declarations should start with 'asmlinkage long', even though this has no effect in your architecture.
Thanks. I will modify it in next version patch.
quoted
diff --git a/arch/nds32/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h b/arch/nds32/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000..2bad1e7 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/nds32/include/uapi/asm/unistd.hquoted
+ +#define __ARCH_WANT_RENAMEAT +#define __ARCH_WANT_SYSCALL_OFF_TThese two should not be here.
Thanks. But, I don't know I should move these two macro to which file. In asm-generic/unistd.h, these two are used to decide whether relative syscall number is defined or not. Therefore, I put these two macros here in order that these two definitions are available in user space.
quoted
+#define __ARCH_WANT_SYNC_FILE_RANGE2This one is fine thoughquoted
+/* Use the standard ABI for syscalls */ +#include <asm-generic/unistd.h> + +__SYSCALL(__NR_fadvise64_64, sys_fadvise64_64_wrapper) +__SYSCALL(__NR_rt_sigreturn, sys_rt_sigreturn_wrapper)I think you are overriding the array assignment here, this may cause a compiler warning when building with "make C=1 V=1" since you have the same index assigned to two pointers. A better way to do this is to override the name: #define sys_rt_sigreturn sys_rt_sigreturn_wrapper #define sys_fadvise64_64 sys_fadvise64_64_wrapper #include <asm-generic/unistd.h>
Thanks, I will follow your suggestion to modify it in the next version patch.
ArndVincent