Re: [PATCH v5 05/10] dt-bindings: net: dwmac-sun8i: update documentation about integrated PHY
From: Corentin Labbe <hidden>
Date: 2017-09-14 18:53:13
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-devicetree, lkml
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 01:20:04PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 09:43:25AM +0200, Corentin Labbe wrote:quoted
On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 09:25:38AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:quoted
On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 09:11:51AM +0200, Corentin Labbe wrote:quoted
This patch add documentation about the MDIO switch used on sun8i-h3-emac for integrated PHY. Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <redacted> --- .../devicetree/bindings/net/dwmac-sun8i.txt | 127 +++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 120 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dwmac-sun8i.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dwmac-sun8i.txt index 725f3b187886..3fa0e54825ea 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dwmac-sun8i.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dwmac-sun8i.txt@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ Optional properties for the following compatibles: - allwinner,leds-active-low: EPHY LEDs are active low Required child node of emac: -- mdio bus node: should be named mdio +- mdio bus node: should be labelled mdiolabels do not end up in the final DT (while the names do) so why are you making this change?I misunderstood label/name. Anyway, this contrainst should leave due to "snps,dwmac-mdio MDIOs are automatically registered"quoted
quoted
Required properties of the mdio node: - #address-cells: shall be 1@@ -48,14 +48,28 @@ Required properties of the mdio node: The device node referenced by "phy" or "phy-handle" should be a child node of the mdio node. See phy.txt for the generic PHY bindings. -Required properties of the phy node with the following compatibles: +The following compatibles require an mdio-mux node called "mdio-mux": + - "allwinner,sun8i-h3-emac" + - "allwinner,sun8i-v3s-emac": +Required properties for the mdio-mux node: + - compatible = "mdio-mux" + - one child mdio for the integrated mdio + - one child mdio for the external mdio if present (V3s have none) +Required properties for the mdio-mux children node: + - reg: 0 for internal MDIO bus, 1 for external MDIO bus + +The following compatibles require a PHY node representing the integrated +PHY, under the integrated MDIO bus node if an mdio-mux node is used: - "allwinner,sun8i-h3-emac", - "allwinner,sun8i-v3s-emac": + +Required properties of the integrated phy node: - clocks: a phandle to the reference clock for the EPHY - resets: a phandle to the reset control for the EPHY +- phy-is-integrated +- Should be a child of the integrated mdioI'm not sure what you mean by that, you ask that it should (so not required?) be a child of the integrated mdio...I will change words to "must"quoted
quoted
-Example: - +Example with integrated PHY: emac: ethernet@1c0b000 { compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-h3-emac"; syscon = <&syscon>;@@ -72,13 +86,112 @@ emac: ethernet@1c0b000 { phy-handle = <&int_mii_phy>; phy-mode = "mii"; allwinner,leds-active-low; + + mdio0: mdio {(You don't label it mdio here, unlike what was asked before)quoted
+ #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; + compatible = "snps,dwmac-mdio"; + };I think Rob wanted that node gone?MDIO mux does not work without a parent MDIO, either gived by "parent-bus" or directly via mdio_mux_init() (like it is the case in dwmac-sun8i)Is the MDIO controller "allwinner,sun8i-h3-emac" or "snps,dwmac-mdio"? If the latter, then I think the node is fine, but then the mux should be a child node of it. IOW, the child of an MDIO controller should either be a mux node or slave devices.
It will be snps,dwmac-mdio but putting mdio-mux as a child of it (the mdio node) give me: [ 18.175338] libphy: stmmac: probed [ 18.175379] mdio_bus stmmac-0: /soc/ethernet@1c30000/mdio/mdio-mux has invalid PHY address [ 18.175408] mdio_bus stmmac-0: scan phy mdio-mux at address 0 [ 18.175450] mdio_bus stmmac-0: scan phy mdio-mux at address 1 [ 18.175482] mdio_bus stmmac-0: scan phy mdio-mux at address 2 [ 18.175513] mdio_bus stmmac-0: scan phy mdio-mux at address 3 [ 18.175544] mdio_bus stmmac-0: scan phy mdio-mux at address 4 [ 18.175575] mdio_bus stmmac-0: scan phy mdio-mux at address 5 [ 18.175607] mdio_bus stmmac-0: scan phy mdio-mux at address 6 [ 18.175638] mdio_bus stmmac-0: scan phy mdio-mux at address 7 [ 18.175669] mdio_bus stmmac-0: scan phy mdio-mux at address 8 [ 18.175700] mdio_bus stmmac-0: scan phy mdio-mux at address 9 [ 18.175731] mdio_bus stmmac-0: scan phy mdio-mux at address 10 [ 18.175762] mdio_bus stmmac-0: scan phy mdio-mux at address 11 [ 18.175795] mdio_bus stmmac-0: scan phy mdio-mux at address 12 [ 18.175827] mdio_bus stmmac-0: scan phy mdio-mux at address 13 [ 18.175858] mdio_bus stmmac-0: scan phy mdio-mux at address 14 [ 18.175889] mdio_bus stmmac-0: scan phy mdio-mux at address 15 [ 18.175919] mdio_bus stmmac-0: scan phy mdio-mux at address 16 [ 18.175951] mdio_bus stmmac-0: scan phy mdio-mux at address 17 [ 18.175982] mdio_bus stmmac-0: scan phy mdio-mux at address 18 [ 18.176014] mdio_bus stmmac-0: scan phy mdio-mux at address 19 [ 18.176045] mdio_bus stmmac-0: scan phy mdio-mux at address 20 [ 18.176076] mdio_bus stmmac-0: scan phy mdio-mux at address 21 [ 18.176107] mdio_bus stmmac-0: scan phy mdio-mux at address 22 [ 18.176139] mdio_bus stmmac-0: scan phy mdio-mux at address 23 [ 18.176170] mdio_bus stmmac-0: scan phy mdio-mux at address 24 [ 18.176202] mdio_bus stmmac-0: scan phy mdio-mux at address 25 [ 18.176233] mdio_bus stmmac-0: scan phy mdio-mux at address 26 [ 18.176271] mdio_bus stmmac-0: scan phy mdio-mux at address 27 [ 18.176320] mdio_bus stmmac-0: scan phy mdio-mux at address 28 [ 18.176371] mdio_bus stmmac-0: scan phy mdio-mux at address 29 [ 18.176420] mdio_bus stmmac-0: scan phy mdio-mux at address 30 [ 18.176452] mdio_bus stmmac-0: scan phy mdio-mux at address 31 Adding a fake <reg> to mdio-mux remove it. Does it is acceptable ? or perhaps patching of_mdiobus_register() to not scan node with compatible "mdio-mux".
quoted
quoted
quoted
+ mdio-mux { + compatible = "mdio-mux"; + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; + + int_mdio: mdio@1 { + reg = <0>;unit address of 1 and reg prop of 0 don't match. Build your dtb with W=2.
reg are arbitrary value (like mdio-mux-mmioreg), but in our case it is easy to fix this warning. Thanks -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html