Le 26/04/2016 20:27, Sergei Shtylyov a écrit :

On 04/26/2016 08:17 PM, David Miller wrote:

quoted

quoted

I plan to queue this patch through arm-soc for 4.7.

Ok.

    How about this patch going thru your net-next repo instead?
I'd like to keep the kernel bisectable... if my phylib/macb patches get merged 
earlier than this one, that board would be broken...

Sergei, David,

I don't think that there is a big risk for this board to be tested in
the meantime as it's not widely deployed yet.
And as I'm aware of the issue and basically maintaining this DT file, I
think that I'll be informed if people try an unlikely arrangement of
patches on this board.

So either way, I'm okay. But I do think it's not worth thinking too much
about this case.

Bye,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre