Thread (23 messages) 23 messages, 5 authors, 2016-02-05

RE: [PATCH v3 net-next] net: Implement fast csum_partial for x86_64

flat view

From: David Laight <hidden>
Date: 2016-02-04 17:13:19

From: Tom Herbert
...
quoted
If nothing else reducing the size of this main loop may be desirable.
I know the newer x86 is supposed to have a loop buffer so that it can
basically loop on already decoded instructions.  Normally it is only
something like 64 or 128 bytes in size though.  You might find that
reducing this loop to that smaller size may improve the performance
for larger payloads.
I saw 128 to be better in my testing. For large packets this loop does
all the work. I see performance dependent on the amount of loop
overhead, i.e. we got it down to two non-adcq instructions but it is
still noticeable. Also, this helps a lot on sizes up to 128 bytes
since we only need to do single call in the jump table and no trip
through the loop.
But one of your 'loop overhead' instructions is 'loop'.
Look at http://www.agner.org/optimize/instruction_tables.pdf
you don't want to be using 'loop' on intel cpus.

You might get some benefit from pipelining the loop (so you do
a read to register in one iteration and a register-register adc
the next).

	David
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help