On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 13:36 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:

quoted

On do, 2015-07-09 at 16:21 -0400, Roy Pledge wrote:

quoted

+#ifdef CONFIG_FSL_DPA_CHECKING
+#define DPA_ASSERT(x) \
+   do { \
+           if (!(x)) { \
+                   pr_crit("ASSERT: (%s:%d) %s\n", __FILE__, __LINE__, \
+                           __stringify_1(x)); \
+                   dump_stack(); \
+                   panic("assertion failure"); \

Not my call, but why panic() here?

I'm pretty sure I've complained about this before (as well as all the
BUG_ONs).

Is the concern here just the call to panic()?  I'm happy to change what happens when an issue is detected but the DPA_ASSERT() calls are very useful when testing changes to the driver and when bringing up the drivers on new silicon variants.