Re: [PATCH 3/3] printk: implement support for extended console drivers
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date: 2015-06-29 16:11:59
Also in:
lkml
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date: 2015-06-29 16:11:59
Also in:
lkml
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Tejun Heo [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 05:47:49PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:quoted
quoted
netconsole itself is optional & modular. I'm not sure making further splits is called for, especially given the use cases.It could be a hidden option, selected by its users (e.g. netconsole).Hmmm... what do you mean?
init/Kconfig:
config PRINTK_EXT_LOG
bool
drivers/net/Kconfig:
config NETCONSOLE
tristate "Network console logging support"
select PRINTK_EXT_LOG
kernel/printk/printk.c:
void console_unlock(void)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_PRINTK_EXT_LOG
static char ext_text[CONSOLE_EXT_LOG_MAX];
#endif
etc.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds