Re: [PATCH 3/3] printk: implement support for extended console drivers
From: josh@joshtriplett.org
Date: 2015-06-29 16:11:43
Also in:
lkml
From: josh@joshtriplett.org
Date: 2015-06-29 16:11:43
Also in:
lkml
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:49:14AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 05:47:49PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:quoted
quoted
netconsole itself is optional & modular. I'm not sure making further splits is called for, especially given the use cases.It could be a hidden option, selected by its users (e.g. netconsole).Hmmm... what do you mean?
config PRINTK_BITS_THAT_NETCONSOLE_NEEDS
(no help text or prompt)
config NETCONSOLE
select PRINTK_BITS_THAT_NETCONSOLE_NEEDS
That would ensure that the bits added to printk don't get compiled in
unless CONFIG_NETCONSOLE=y.
- Josh Triplett