Thanks Rusty,

At Wed, 01 Apr 2015 11:59:39 +1030,
Rusty Russell wrote:

Hajime Tazaki [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

the issue here is the decision between 'no-ops' and
'assert(false)' depends on the context. an auto-generated
mechanism needs some hand-written parameters I think.

Yes, I used auto-generated (fprintf, abort) stubs for similar testing in
pettycoin, where if it failed to link it would generate such stubs
for undefined symbols.

It's not a panacea, but it helps speed up rejiggin after code changes.
Generating noop stubs can actually make that process slower, as you can
get failures because you now need to do something in that stub.

is it the following ? it's really cool stuff !

https://github.com/rustyrussell/pettycoin/blob/master/test/mockup.sh
 
-- Hajime

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>