Re: [RFC PATCH 00/11] an introduction of library operating system for Linux (LibOS)
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date: 2015-03-27 03:50:01
Also in:
linux-arch, linux-mm, lkml
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date: 2015-03-27 03:50:01
Also in:
linux-arch, linux-mm, lkml
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 4:31 AM, Rusty Russell [off-list ref] wrote:
Richard Weinberger [off-list ref] writes:quoted
This also infers that arch/lib will be broken most of the time as every time the networking stack references a new symbol it has to be duplicated into arch/lib. But this does not mean that your idea is bad, all I want to say that I'm not sure whether arch/lib is the right approach. Maybe Arnd has a better idea.Exactly why I look forward to getting this in-tree. Jeremy Kerr and I wrote nfsim back in 2005(!) which stubbed around the netfilter infrastructure; with failtest and valgrind it found some nasty bugs. It was too much hassle to maintain out-of-tree though :( I look forward to a flood of great bugfixes from this work :)
IIRC, the ability to run UML under valgrind was also one of its key features?
And that's not limited to networking.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds