Re: [RFC PATCH 00/11] an introduction of library operating system for Linux (LibOS)
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Date: 2015-03-24 13:22:22
Also in:
linux-arch, linux-mm, lkml
Am 24.03.2015 um 14:10 schrieb Hajime Tazaki: > == More information ==
The crucial difference between UML (user-mode linux) and this approach is that we allow multiple network stack instances to co-exist within a single process with dlmopen(3) like linking for easy debugging.
Is this the only difference? We already have arch/um, why do you need arch/lib/ then? My point is, can't you merge your arch/lib into the existing arch/um stuff?
From a very rough look your arch/lib seems like a micro UML.
BTW: There was already an idea for having UML as regular library. See: http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/old/projects.html "UML as a normal userspace library" Thanks, //richard -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>