Am 24.03.2015 um 14:10 schrieb Hajime Tazaki:
 > == More information ==

The crucial difference between UML (user-mode linux) and this approach
is that we allow multiple network stack instances to co-exist within a
single process with dlmopen(3) like linking for easy debugging.

Is this the only difference?
We already have arch/um, why do you need arch/lib/ then?
My point is, can't you merge your arch/lib into the existing arch/um stuff?

From a very rough look your arch/lib seems like a micro UML.

BTW: There was already an idea for having UML as regular library.
See: http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/old/projects.html
"UML as a normal userspace library"

Thanks,
//richard

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>