Thread (14 messages) flat view 14 messages, 7 authors, 2014-02-13
STALE4583d

[PATCH] net: correct error path in rtnl_newlink()

From: Cong Wang <hidden>
Date: 2014-02-11 23:51:45
Subsystem: networking [general], the rest · Maintainers: "David S. Miller", Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Linus Torvalds

From: Cong Wang <redacted>

I saw the following BUG when ->newlink() fails in rtnl_newlink():

[   40.240058] kernel BUG at net/core/dev.c:6438!

this is due to free_netdev() is not supposed to be called before
netdev is completely unregistered, therefore it is not correct
to call free_netdev() here, at least for ops->newlink!=NULL case,
many drivers call it in ->destructor so that rtnl_unlock() will
take care of it, we probably don't need to do anything here.

Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <redacted>
---
 net/core/rtnetlink.c | 19 ++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
index 048dc8d..1a0dac2 100644
--- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
+++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
@@ -1963,16 +1963,21 @@ replay:
 
 		dev->ifindex = ifm->ifi_index;
 
-		if (ops->newlink)
+		if (ops->newlink) {
 			err = ops->newlink(net, dev, tb, data);
-		else
+			/* Drivers should call free_netdev() in ->destructor
+			 * and unregister it on failure so that device could be
+			 * finally freed in rtnl_unlock.
+			 */
+			if (err < 0)
+				goto out;
+		} else {
 			err = register_netdevice(dev);
-
-		if (err < 0) {
-			free_netdev(dev);
-			goto out;
+			if (err < 0) {
+				free_netdev(dev);
+				goto out;
+			}
 		}
-
 		err = rtnl_configure_link(dev, ifm);
 		if (err < 0)
 			unregister_netdevice(dev);
-- 
1.8.3.1
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help