On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 07:32:49PM +0000, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 09:10:35PM +0200, Eilon Greenstein wrote:
quoted
About the logic - true, if diff will show deleted lines after newly
added lines, some new double line segments will be missed. However, it
seems like few other things will break if diff will start acting out
like that. The suggestion you posted earlier will miss those as well,
and starting to check for this weird case (of deleted lines after the
added lines) does not seem right.
Actually the version I sent should indeed cope with the deleted lines
regardless of order. It was cirtainly intended to.
... and I think I thought of a couple more corner cases neither solution
will find. So I am going to go away and make up a proper set of tests
for this apparently simple change. As it is really annoying when it
false positives. I will post against when I have something which works.
-apw