Thread (21 messages) flat view 21 messages, 3 authors, 2012-11-21

Re: [PATCH v2] checkpatch: add double empty line check

From: Eilon Greenstein <hidden>
Date: 2012-11-20 16:06:50
Also in: lkml
Subsystem: the rest · Maintainer: Linus Torvalds

On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 15:44 +0000, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 05:07:07PM +0200, Eilon Greenstein wrote:
quoted
On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 14:43 +0000, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
Also this fails if the fragment
is at the top of the hunk emiting a perl warning.
I did not see this warning. Can you please share this example? I tried
adding a couple of empty lines at the beginning of a file and it seemed
to work just fine for me (using perl v5.14.2).lines
Ok, this is actually if it is at the bottom, not the top.  So if you
have a range of lines newly added to the bottom of the file.  Leading to
this warning:

Use of uninitialized value within @rawlines in pattern match (m//) at
../checkpatch/scripts/checkpatch.pl line 3586.
Oh... of course, I should have seen that. I did not check changes at the
end of the file.

What do you say about something like that (using nextline out of
rawlines only if it defined):
diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index 21a9f5d..c0c610c 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -3579,6 +3579,19 @@ sub process {
                        WARN("EXPORTED_WORLD_WRITABLE",
                             "Exporting world writable files is usually an error. Consider more restrictive permissions.
                }
+
+# check for double empty lines
+               if ($line =~ /^\+\s*$/) {
+                       my $nextline = "";
+                       if (defined($rawlines[$linenr])) {
+                               $nextline = $rawlines[$linenr];
+                       }
+                       if ($nextline =~ /^\s*$/ ||
+                           $prevline =~ /^\+?\s*$/ && $nextline !~ /^\+\s*$/) {
+                               CHK("DOUBLE_EMPTY_LINE",
+                                   "One empty line should be sufficient. Consider removing this one.\n" . $herecurr);
+                       }
+               }
        }
 
You cannot really rely on nextline even if valid as it may not even be
from this hunk.  This is why in my attempt I detected the top of a long
run of blanks and let the hunk start initialisation reset the detector.

I'm only testing the nextline if the current line is newly added. If I
got it right, when a line is newly added, the next line can be:
a. another new line
b. existing line (provided for context)
c. Does not exist since this is the end of the file (I missed this one
originally)

It cannot just jump to the next hunk and it cannot be a deleted line,
right?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
From 6556d7bc2f9447e1d179c1dd32a618b124c26e46 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 13:17:37 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] checkpatch: strict warning for multiple blank lines

Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
---
 scripts/checkpatch.pl |   11 +++++++++++
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index fb67d47..ae01b90 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -1413,6 +1413,7 @@ sub process {
 	my %suppress_whiletrailers;
 	my %suppress_export;
 	my $suppress_statement = 0;
+	my $suppress_multipleblank = -1;
 
 	# Pre-scan the patch sanitizing the lines.
 	# Pre-scan the patch looking for any __setup documentation.
@@ -1523,6 +1524,7 @@ sub process {
 			%suppress_whiletrailers = ();
 			%suppress_export = ();
 			$suppress_statement = 0;
+			$suppress_multipleblank = -1;
 			next;
 
 # track the line number as we move through the hunk, note that
@@ -1945,6 +1947,15 @@ sub process {
 			      "use the SSYNC() macro in asm/blackfin.h\n" . $herevet);
 		}
 
+# multiple blank lines.
+		if ($line =~ /^-/ || ($suppress_multipleblank == $linenr && $line =~ /^[ \+]\s*$/)) {
+			$suppress_multipleblank++;
+		} elsif ($prevline =~ /^\+\s*$/ and $line =~ /^\+\s*$/) {
+			$suppress_multipleblank = $linenr + 1;
+			CHK("MULTIPLE_EMPTY_LINE",
+			    "One empty line should be sufficient. Consider removing this one.\n" . $herecurr);
+		}
+
 # Check for potential 'bare' types
 		my ($stat, $cond, $line_nr_next, $remain_next, $off_next,
 		    $realline_next);
Please consider this patch as an example to three newly added double
empty lines that are not caught by this version but are seen in the
attempt I sent before:
diff --git a/test.c b/test.c
index e3f1362..5ced040 100644
--- a/test.c
+++ b/test.c
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 
+
 /* there is an empty line just above me (the first line in this file)
  * nothing
  * nothing
@@ -12,17 +13,8 @@
  */
  /* There is an empty line just below me */
 
-/* nothing
- * nothing
- * nothing
- * nothing
- * nothing
- * nothing
- * nothing
- * nothing
- * nothing
- * nothing
- */
+
+/* just added a new empty line after deleting a segment */
 /* nothing
  * nothing
  * nothing
@@ -36,3 +28,4 @@
  */
  /* The last line (right below me) is empty */
 
+
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help