This series contains patches required to let the kernel run on a TI
am335x, like the popular BeagleBone. None of these patches are from
me, yet all of them are essential fixes. For net-next I have prepared
a cpsw driver extension that enables time stamping and a PTP clock,
but in order to be useful, the kernel must boot and the MAC driver
must be working.
The first patch was supposed to have made -rc1, but it seems to have
been forgotten. The other four patches are for the cpsw MAC driver,
which has not worked since the migration to device tree. Actually, I
am not sure if the cpsw ever did work, but in any case these patches
let the driver work (again), rather than being a lifeless derelict.
Thanks,
Richard
Mugunthan V N (2):
ARM: OMAP3+: hwmod: Add AM33XX HWMOD data for davinci_mdio
arm/dts: am33xx: Add cpsw and mdio module nodes for AM33XX
Vaibhav Hiremath (2):
net: davinci_mdio: Fix type mistake in calling runtime-pm api
net: cpsw: Add parent<->child relation support between cpsw and mdio
hvaibhav@ti.com (1):
ARM: OMAP2+: gpmc: Fix kernel BUG for DT boot mode
arch/arm/boot/dts/am335x-bone.dts | 8 ++++
arch/arm/boot/dts/am335x-evm.dts | 8 ++++
arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c | 4 ++
arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_33xx_data.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++-
drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 16 ++++++++-
drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_mdio.c | 2 +-
7 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--
1.7.2.5
From: hvaibhav@ti.com <redacted>
With recent changes in omap gpmc driver code, in case of DT
boot mode, where bootloader does not configure gpmc cs space
will result into kernel BUG() inside gpmc_mem_init() function,
as gpmc cs0 gpmc_config7[0].csvalid bit is set to '1' and
gpmc_config7[0].baseaddress is set to '0' on reset.
This use-case is applicable for any board/EVM which doesn't have
any peripheral connected to gpmc cs0, for example BeagleXM and
BeagleBone, so DT boot mode fails.
This patch adds of_have_populated_dt() check before creating
device, so that for DT boot mode, gpmc probe will not be called
which is expected behavior, as gpmc is not supported yet from DT.
Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Hiremath <redacted>
Cc: Afzal Mohammed <redacted>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc Paul Walmsley [off-list ref]
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c | 4 ++++
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
@@ -981,6 +981,10 @@ static int __init omap_gpmc_init(void)structplatform_device*pdev;char*oh_name="gpmc";+/* If dtb is there, the devices will be created dynamically */+if(of_have_populated_dt())+return-ENODEV;+oh=omap_hwmod_lookup(oh_name);if(!oh){pr_err("Could not look up %s\n",oh_name);
From: Mugunthan V N <redacted>
This patch adds minimal hwmod support for davinci mdio driver. This patch
requires rework on parent child relation between cpsw and davinci mdio
hwmod data to support runtime PM.
Signed-off-by: Mugunthan V N <redacted>
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_33xx_data.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
From: Vaibhav Hiremath <redacted>
By mistake (most likely a copy-paste), instead of pm_runtime_get_sync()
api, driver is calling pm_runtime_put_sync() api in resume callback
function. The bug was introduced by commit id (ae2c07aaf74:
davinci_mdio: runtime PM support).
Now, the reason why it didn't impact functionality is, the patch has
been tested on AM335x-EVM and BeagleBone platform while submitting;
and in case of AM335x the MDIO driver doesn't control the module
enable/disable part, which is handled by CPSW driver.
Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Hiremath <redacted>
Cc: Mugunthan V N <redacted>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_mdio.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
@@ -465,7 +465,7 @@ static int davinci_mdio_resume(struct device *dev)u32ctrl;spin_lock(&data->lock);-pm_runtime_put_sync(data->dev);+pm_runtime_get_sync(data->dev);/* restart the scan state machine */ctrl=__raw_readl(&data->regs->control);
From: Vaibhav Hiremath <redacted>
CPGMAC SubSystem consist of various sub-modules, like, mdio, cpdma,
cpsw, etc... These sub-modules are also used in some of Davinci family
of devices. Now based on requirement, use-case and available technology
nodes the integration of these sub-modules varies across devices.
So coming back to Linux net driver, currently separate and independent
platform devices & drivers for CPSW and MDIO is implemented. In case of
Davinci they both has separate control, from resources perspective,
like clock.
In case of AM33XX, the resources are shared and only one register
bit-field is provided to control module/clock enable/disable, makes it
difficult to handle common resource.
So the solution here implemented in this patch is,
Create parent<->child relationship between both the drivers, making
CPSW as a parent and MDIO as its child and enumerate all the child nodes
under cpsw module.
Both the drivers will function exactly the way it was operating before,
including runtime-pm functionality. No change is required in MDIO driver
(for that matter to any child driver).
As this is only supported during DT boot, the parent<->child relationship
is created and populated in DT execution flow. The only required change
is inside DTS file, making MDIO as a child to CPSW node.
Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Hiremath <redacted>
Cc: Mugunthan V N <redacted>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
@@ -827,7 +827,7 @@ static int cpsw_probe_dt(struct cpsw_platform_data *data,}data->mac_control=prop;-for_each_child_of_node(node,slave_node){+for_each_node_by_name(slave_node,"slave"){structcpsw_slave_data*slave_data=data->slave_data+i;constchar*phy_id=NULL;constvoid*mac_addr=NULL;
@@ -862,6 +862,14 @@ static int cpsw_probe_dt(struct cpsw_platform_data *data,i++;}+/*+*Populateallthechildnodeshere...+*/+ret=of_platform_populate(node,NULL,NULL,&pdev->dev);+/* We do not want to force this, as in some cases may not have child */+if(ret)+pr_warn("Doesn't have any child node\n");+return0;error_ret:
@@ -895,6 +903,11 @@ static int __devinit cpsw_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)priv->msg_enable=netif_msg_init(debug_level,CPSW_DEBUG);priv->rx_packet_max=max(rx_packet_max,128);+/*+*Thismayberequiredhereforchilddevices.+*/+pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);+if(cpsw_probe_dt(&priv->data,pdev)){pr_err("cpsw: platform data missing\n");ret=-ENODEV;
@@ -921,7 +934,6 @@ static int __devinit cpsw_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)for(i=0;i<data->slaves;i++)priv->slaves[i].slave_num=i;-pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);priv->clk=clk_get(&pdev->dev,"fck");if(IS_ERR(priv->clk)){dev_err(&pdev->dev,"fck is not found\n");
From: Mugunthan V N <redacted>
Add CPSW and MDIO related device tree data for AM33XX.
Also enable them into board/evm dts files by providing
respective phy-id.
Signed-off-by: Mugunthan V N <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Hiremath <redacted>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/am335x-bone.dts | 8 ++++++
arch/arm/boot/dts/am335x-evm.dts | 8 ++++++
arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
@@ -210,5 +210,55 @@interrupt-parent=<&intc>;interrupts=<91>;};++mac:ethernet@4A100000{+compatible="ti,cpsw";+ti,hwmods="cpgmac0";+cpdma_channels=<8>;+host_port_no=<0>;+cpdma_reg_ofs=<0x800>;+cpdma_sram_ofs=<0xa00>;+ale_reg_ofs=<0xd00>;+ale_entries=<1024>;+host_port_reg_ofs=<0x108>;+hw_stats_reg_ofs=<0x900>;+bd_ram_ofs=<0x2000>;+bd_ram_size=<0x2000>;+no_bd_ram=<0>;+rx_descs=<64>;+mac_control=<0x20>;+slaves=<2>;+reg=<0x4a1000000x800+0x4a1012000x100+0x4a1010000x100>;+#address-cells=<1>;+#size-cells=<1>;+interrupt-parent=<&intc>;+/* c0_rx_thresh_pend c0_rx_pend c0_tx_pend c0_misc_pend*/+interrupts=<40414243>;+ranges;+cpsw_emac0:slave@0{+slave_reg_ofs=<0x208>;+sliver_reg_ofs=<0xd80>;+/* Filled in by U-Boot */+mac-address=[000000000000];+};+cpsw_emac1:slave@1{+slave_reg_ofs=<0x308>;+sliver_reg_ofs=<0xdc0>;+/* Filled in by U-Boot */+mac-address=[000000000000];+};++davinci_mdio:mdio@4a101000{+compatible="ti,davinci_mdio";+#address-cells=<1>;+#size-cells=<0>;+ti,hwmods="davinci_mdio";+bus_freq=<1000000>;+reg=<0x4a1010000x100>;+};++};};};
From: hvaibhav@ti.com <redacted>
With recent changes in omap gpmc driver code, in case of DT
boot mode, where bootloader does not configure gpmc cs space
will result into kernel BUG() inside gpmc_mem_init() function,
as gpmc cs0 gpmc_config7[0].csvalid bit is set to '1' and
gpmc_config7[0].baseaddress is set to '0' on reset.
This use-case is applicable for any board/EVM which doesn't have
any peripheral connected to gpmc cs0, for example BeagleXM and
BeagleBone, so DT boot mode fails.
This patch adds of_have_populated_dt() check before creating
device, so that for DT boot mode, gpmc probe will not be called
which is expected behavior, as gpmc is not supported yet from DT.
I'm applying this one into omap-for-v3.7-rc1/fixes-part2.
Next time, please also cc linux-omap@vger.kernel.org for series
like this. I'm sure the people reading the omap list are interested
in these.
Regards,
Tony
From: Mugunthan V N <redacted>
This patch adds minimal hwmod support for davinci mdio driver. This patch
requires rework on parent child relation between cpsw and davinci mdio
hwmod data to support runtime PM.
Looks like Paul Walmsley may have missed this one, maybe please resend
with him and linux-omap cc:d.
Regards,
Tony
From: Mugunthan V N <redacted>
Add CPSW and MDIO related device tree data for AM33XX.
Also enable them into board/evm dts files by providing
respective phy-id.
These omap specific .dts changes should be queued by Benoit Cousson,
please cc him and linux-omap.
Regards,
Tony
From: Jon Hunter <hidden> Date: 2012-10-16 19:47:56
On 10/15/2012 02:16 PM, Richard Cochran wrote:
From: hvaibhav@ti.com <redacted>
With recent changes in omap gpmc driver code, in case of DT
boot mode, where bootloader does not configure gpmc cs space
will result into kernel BUG() inside gpmc_mem_init() function,
as gpmc cs0 gpmc_config7[0].csvalid bit is set to '1' and
gpmc_config7[0].baseaddress is set to '0' on reset.
I am not sure I completely follow the logic here.
Won't this problem occur if the bootloader does not configure the gpmc
cs space AND we are not using DT?
Is the csvalid bit set because we are booting from the internal ROM?
I guess I don't see why csvalid bit being set and a base-address of 0x0
should not be allowed. That should be a valid combination.
One problem I see with gpmc_mem_init() is that it assumes that
BOOT_ROM_SPACE is 1MB for all devices starting at 0x0 apart from the
apollon board. For newer devices such as OMAP4, there is only 48KB of
internal ROM and only mapped to 0x0 when booting from internal ROM. So
this needs to be fixed.
How much internal ROM does the AM335x have and where is it mapped?
This use-case is applicable for any board/EVM which doesn't have
any peripheral connected to gpmc cs0, for example BeagleXM and
BeagleBone, so DT boot mode fails.
This patch adds of_have_populated_dt() check before creating
device, so that for DT boot mode, gpmc probe will not be called
which is expected behavior, as gpmc is not supported yet from DT.
Yes, but we do actually still allow some platform devices to be probed
(such as dmtimers) when booting with DT that don't support DT yet. So
this change prevents us from using the gpmc on boards when booting with DT.
I am not convinced that this is addressing the underlying problem with
gpmc_mem_init().
Cheers
Jon
From: Jon Hunter <hidden> Date: 2012-10-16 20:58:53
Hi Tony,
On 10/16/2012 12:48 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Richard Cochran [off-list ref] [121015 12:18]:
quoted
From: hvaibhav@ti.com <redacted>
With recent changes in omap gpmc driver code, in case of DT
boot mode, where bootloader does not configure gpmc cs space
will result into kernel BUG() inside gpmc_mem_init() function,
as gpmc cs0 gpmc_config7[0].csvalid bit is set to '1' and
gpmc_config7[0].baseaddress is set to '0' on reset.
This use-case is applicable for any board/EVM which doesn't have
any peripheral connected to gpmc cs0, for example BeagleXM and
BeagleBone, so DT boot mode fails.
This patch adds of_have_populated_dt() check before creating
device, so that for DT boot mode, gpmc probe will not be called
which is expected behavior, as gpmc is not supported yet from DT.
I'm applying this one into omap-for-v3.7-rc1/fixes-part2.
Next time, please also cc linux-omap@vger.kernel.org for series
like this. I'm sure the people reading the omap list are interested
in these.
This patch appears to be masking an underlying issue. How about
something like the following ...
Cheers
Jon
From 753a4928bf6f7baa4c001bdca3d15a85e999db4c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jon Hunter <redacted>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 15:22:58 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: Allow kernel to boot even if GPMC fails to
reserve memory
Currently, if the GPMC driver fails to reserve memory when probed we will
call BUG() and the kernel will not boot. Instead of calling BUG(), return
an error from probe and allow kernel to boot.
Tested on AM335x beagle bone board.
Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <redacted>
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
@@ -868,9 +868,9 @@ static void __devexit gpmc_mem_exit(void)}-staticvoid__devinitgpmc_mem_init(void)+staticint__devinitgpmc_mem_init(void){-intcs;+intcs,rc;unsignedlongboot_rom_space=0;/* never allocate the first page, to facilitate bug detection;
Hi Tony,
On 10/16/2012 12:48 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
quoted
* Richard Cochran [off-list ref] [121015 12:18]:
quoted
From: hvaibhav@ti.com <redacted>
With recent changes in omap gpmc driver code, in case of DT
boot mode, where bootloader does not configure gpmc cs space
will result into kernel BUG() inside gpmc_mem_init() function,
as gpmc cs0 gpmc_config7[0].csvalid bit is set to '1' and
gpmc_config7[0].baseaddress is set to '0' on reset.
This use-case is applicable for any board/EVM which doesn't have
any peripheral connected to gpmc cs0, for example BeagleXM and
BeagleBone, so DT boot mode fails.
This patch adds of_have_populated_dt() check before creating
device, so that for DT boot mode, gpmc probe will not be called
which is expected behavior, as gpmc is not supported yet from DT.
I'm applying this one into omap-for-v3.7-rc1/fixes-part2.
Next time, please also cc linux-omap@vger.kernel.org for series
like this. I'm sure the people reading the omap list are interested
in these.
This patch appears to be masking an underlying issue. How about
something like the following ...
OK that looks good to me. I'll drop the earlier fix and use
yours instead.
Regards,
Tony
From: Jon Hunter <hidden> Date: 2012-10-17 14:41:25
On 10/16/2012 04:26 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Jon Hunter [off-list ref] [121016 14:00]:
quoted
Hi Tony,
On 10/16/2012 12:48 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
quoted
* Richard Cochran [off-list ref] [121015 12:18]:
quoted
From: hvaibhav@ti.com <redacted>
With recent changes in omap gpmc driver code, in case of DT
boot mode, where bootloader does not configure gpmc cs space
will result into kernel BUG() inside gpmc_mem_init() function,
as gpmc cs0 gpmc_config7[0].csvalid bit is set to '1' and
gpmc_config7[0].baseaddress is set to '0' on reset.
This use-case is applicable for any board/EVM which doesn't have
any peripheral connected to gpmc cs0, for example BeagleXM and
BeagleBone, so DT boot mode fails.
This patch adds of_have_populated_dt() check before creating
device, so that for DT boot mode, gpmc probe will not be called
which is expected behavior, as gpmc is not supported yet from DT.
I'm applying this one into omap-for-v3.7-rc1/fixes-part2.
Next time, please also cc linux-omap@vger.kernel.org for series
like this. I'm sure the people reading the omap list are interested
in these.
This patch appears to be masking an underlying issue. How about
something like the following ...
OK that looks good to me. I'll drop the earlier fix and use
yours instead.
Hi Tony, sorry but I realised now that in my patch that I need to
take care of releasing and memory and clocks that were acquired
during the probe. Here is a V2. If you prefer I can create a delta
patch also with the previous.
Cheers
Jon
From 91f5234d567c07ce1579b50e52de1a1e06ce5c68 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jon Hunter <redacted>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 15:22:58 -0500
Subject: [PATCH V2] ARM: OMAP2+: Allow kernel to boot even if GPMC fails to
reserve memory
Currently, if the GPMC driver fails to reserve memory when probed we will
call BUG() and the kernel will not boot. Instead of calling BUG(), return
an error from probe and allow kernel to boot.
Boot tested on AM335x beagle bone board and OMAP4430 Panda board.
V2 changes:
- Ensure that clock and memory resources are released on error.
Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <redacted>
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
@@ -868,9 +868,9 @@ static void __devexit gpmc_mem_exit(void)}-staticvoid__devinitgpmc_mem_init(void)+staticint__devinitgpmc_mem_init(void){-intcs;+intcs,rc;unsignedlongboot_rom_space=0;/* never allocate the first page, to facilitate bug detection;
Hi Tony,
On 10/16/2012 12:48 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
quoted
* Richard Cochran [off-list ref] [121015 12:18]:
quoted
From: hvaibhav@ti.com <redacted>
With recent changes in omap gpmc driver code, in case of DT
boot mode, where bootloader does not configure gpmc cs space
will result into kernel BUG() inside gpmc_mem_init() function,
as gpmc cs0 gpmc_config7[0].csvalid bit is set to '1' and
gpmc_config7[0].baseaddress is set to '0' on reset.
This use-case is applicable for any board/EVM which doesn't have
any peripheral connected to gpmc cs0, for example BeagleXM and
BeagleBone, so DT boot mode fails.
This patch adds of_have_populated_dt() check before creating
device, so that for DT boot mode, gpmc probe will not be called
which is expected behavior, as gpmc is not supported yet from DT.
I'm applying this one into omap-for-v3.7-rc1/fixes-part2.
Next time, please also cc linux-omap@vger.kernel.org for series
like this. I'm sure the people reading the omap list are interested
in these.
This patch appears to be masking an underlying issue. How about
something like the following ...
OK that looks good to me. I'll drop the earlier fix and use
yours instead.
Hi Tony, sorry but I realised now that in my patch that I need to
take care of releasing and memory and clocks that were acquired
during the probe. Here is a V2. If you prefer I can create a delta
patch also with the previous.
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 00:46:34, Richard Cochran wrote:
From: Vaibhav Hiremath <redacted>
CPGMAC SubSystem consist of various sub-modules, like, mdio, cpdma,
cpsw, etc... These sub-modules are also used in some of Davinci family
of devices. Now based on requirement, use-case and available technology
nodes the integration of these sub-modules varies across devices.
So coming back to Linux net driver, currently separate and independent
platform devices & drivers for CPSW and MDIO is implemented. In case of
Davinci they both has separate control, from resources perspective,
like clock.
In case of AM33XX, the resources are shared and only one register
bit-field is provided to control module/clock enable/disable, makes it
difficult to handle common resource.
So the solution here implemented in this patch is,
Create parent<->child relationship between both the drivers, making
CPSW as a parent and MDIO as its child and enumerate all the child nodes
under cpsw module.
Both the drivers will function exactly the way it was operating before,
including runtime-pm functionality. No change is required in MDIO driver
(for that matter to any child driver).
As this is only supported during DT boot, the parent<->child relationship
is created and populated in DT execution flow. The only required change
is inside DTS file, making MDIO as a child to CPSW node.
Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Hiremath <redacted>
Cc: Mugunthan V N <redacted>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Thanks for stepping ahead and submitting patches from my tree.
Thanks,
Vaibhav
@@ -827,7 +827,7 @@ static int cpsw_probe_dt(struct cpsw_platform_data *data,}data->mac_control=prop;-for_each_child_of_node(node,slave_node){+for_each_node_by_name(slave_node,"slave"){structcpsw_slave_data*slave_data=data->slave_data+i;constchar*phy_id=NULL;constvoid*mac_addr=NULL;
@@ -862,6 +862,14 @@ static int cpsw_probe_dt(struct cpsw_platform_data *data,i++;}+/*+*Populateallthechildnodeshere...+*/+ret=of_platform_populate(node,NULL,NULL,&pdev->dev);+/* We do not want to force this, as in some cases may not have child */+if(ret)+pr_warn("Doesn't have any child node\n");+return0;error_ret:
@@ -895,6 +903,11 @@ static int __devinit cpsw_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)priv->msg_enable=netif_msg_init(debug_level,CPSW_DEBUG);priv->rx_packet_max=max(rx_packet_max,128);+/*+*Thismayberequiredhereforchilddevices.+*/+pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);+if(cpsw_probe_dt(&priv->data,pdev)){pr_err("cpsw: platform data missing\n");ret=-ENODEV;
@@ -921,7 +934,6 @@ static int __devinit cpsw_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)for(i=0;i<data->slaves;i++)priv->slaves[i].slave_num=i;-pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);priv->clk=clk_get(&pdev->dev,"fck");if(IS_ERR(priv->clk)){dev_err(&pdev->dev,"fck is not found\n");
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 00:46:33, Richard Cochran wrote:
From: Vaibhav Hiremath <redacted>
By mistake (most likely a copy-paste), instead of pm_runtime_get_sync()
api, driver is calling pm_runtime_put_sync() api in resume callback
function. The bug was introduced by commit id (ae2c07aaf74:
davinci_mdio: runtime PM support).
Now, the reason why it didn't impact functionality is, the patch has
been tested on AM335x-EVM and BeagleBone platform while submitting;
and in case of AM335x the MDIO driver doesn't control the module
enable/disable part, which is handled by CPSW driver.
Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Hiremath <redacted>
Cc: Mugunthan V N <redacted>
Thanks for submitting the patches, I couldn't able to do it for almost 2
weeks now. I really appreciate it.
Thanks,
Vaibhav
@@ -465,7 +465,7 @@ static int davinci_mdio_resume(struct device *dev)u32ctrl;spin_lock(&data->lock);-pm_runtime_put_sync(data->dev);+pm_runtime_get_sync(data->dev);/* restart the scan state machine */ctrl=__raw_readl(&data->regs->control);
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 01:17:56, Hunter, Jon wrote:
On 10/15/2012 02:16 PM, Richard Cochran wrote:
quoted
From: hvaibhav@ti.com <redacted>
With recent changes in omap gpmc driver code, in case of DT
boot mode, where bootloader does not configure gpmc cs space
will result into kernel BUG() inside gpmc_mem_init() function,
as gpmc cs0 gpmc_config7[0].csvalid bit is set to '1' and
gpmc_config7[0].baseaddress is set to '0' on reset.
I am not sure I completely follow the logic here.
Won't this problem occur if the bootloader does not configure the gpmc
cs space AND we are not using DT?
That's what exactly the above comment describes.
Is the csvalid bit set because we are booting from the internal ROM?
As per TRM, the reset value of the CS0_valis bit is set to 0. I have pasted
TRM statement below -
"Chip-select enable (reset value is 1 for CS[0] and 0 for CS[1-5])."
And same applies to OMAP3 family of devices.
I guess I don't see why csvalid bit being set and a base-address of 0x0
should not be allowed. That should be a valid combination.
Yes, agreed.
One problem I see with gpmc_mem_init() is that it assumes that
BOOT_ROM_SPACE is 1MB for all devices starting at 0x0 apart from the
apollon board. For newer devices such as OMAP4, there is only 48KB of
internal ROM and only mapped to 0x0 when booting from internal ROM. So
this needs to be fixed.
How much internal ROM does the AM335x have and where is it mapped?
This use-case is applicable for any board/EVM which doesn't have
any peripheral connected to gpmc cs0, for example BeagleXM and
BeagleBone, so DT boot mode fails.
This patch adds of_have_populated_dt() check before creating
device, so that for DT boot mode, gpmc probe will not be called
which is expected behavior, as gpmc is not supported yet from DT.
Yes, but we do actually still allow some platform devices to be probed
(such as dmtimers) when booting with DT that don't support DT yet. So
this change prevents us from using the gpmc on boards when booting with DT.
The idea here was,
In order to use GPMC in meaningful way, where some peripheral is connected
to the GPMC, you must create platform_device for the probe to happen
properly. Now all the devices I know so far, we have gpmc_smsc911x_init(),
omap_nand_flash_init(), etc...
These api's are getting called only through machine_desc.init_xxx callbacks,
And in case of DT, we have centralized machine_desc definition for all
platforms (board-generic.c). So even though you want to use GPMC for DT boot
mode, you can not make use of peripheral without changing board-files to
change to create platform_device.
Does it make sense?
I am not convinced that this is addressing the underlying problem with
gpmc_mem_init().
The patch you submitted is cleanup patch and is required irrespective of
this patch. I believe this patch is just makes sure that, if you are booting
from DT and you do not have meaningful DT node for GPMC and peripheral
interfaced to it, no point in probing it.
Does it make any sense???
On other hand, Your patch is anyway required, as that I would consider as
cleanup of existing code (in error handling).
Thanks,
Vaibhav
From: Jon Hunter <hidden> Date: 2012-10-18 16:42:07
On 10/18/2012 11:16 AM, Hiremath, Vaibhav wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 01:17:56, Hunter, Jon wrote:
quoted
On 10/15/2012 02:16 PM, Richard Cochran wrote:
quoted
From: hvaibhav@ti.com <redacted>
With recent changes in omap gpmc driver code, in case of DT
boot mode, where bootloader does not configure gpmc cs space
will result into kernel BUG() inside gpmc_mem_init() function,
as gpmc cs0 gpmc_config7[0].csvalid bit is set to '1' and
gpmc_config7[0].baseaddress is set to '0' on reset.
I am not sure I completely follow the logic here.
Won't this problem occur if the bootloader does not configure the gpmc
cs space AND we are not using DT?
That's what exactly the above comment describes.
Hmm ... you said "in the case of DT", but I am saying even "in the case
WITHOUT DT" this can happen. So I think the subject is mis-leading.
quoted
Is the csvalid bit set because we are booting from the internal ROM?
As per TRM, the reset value of the CS0_valis bit is set to 0. I have pasted
TRM statement below -
"Chip-select enable (reset value is 1 for CS[0] and 0 for CS[1-5])."
The above two sentences don't see to agree ...
And same applies to OMAP3 family of devices.
For which boot-modes? All or just the gpmc boot-modes?
My omap3430 beagle has been booting with DT fine for some time and I
have not encountered this problem even on the latest kernel with the
gpmc driver present.
quoted
I guess I don't see why csvalid bit being set and a base-address of 0x0
should not be allowed. That should be a valid combination.
Yes, agreed.
quoted
One problem I see with gpmc_mem_init() is that it assumes that
BOOT_ROM_SPACE is 1MB for all devices starting at 0x0 apart from the
apollon board. For newer devices such as OMAP4, there is only 48KB of
internal ROM and only mapped to 0x0 when booting from internal ROM. So
this needs to be fixed.
How much internal ROM does the AM335x have and where is it mapped?
Does the boot ROM get mapped to 0x0, when booting from ROM?
quoted
quoted
This use-case is applicable for any board/EVM which doesn't have
any peripheral connected to gpmc cs0, for example BeagleXM and
BeagleBone, so DT boot mode fails.
This patch adds of_have_populated_dt() check before creating
device, so that for DT boot mode, gpmc probe will not be called
which is expected behavior, as gpmc is not supported yet from DT.
Yes, but we do actually still allow some platform devices to be probed
(such as dmtimers) when booting with DT that don't support DT yet. So
this change prevents us from using the gpmc on boards when booting with DT.
The idea here was,
In order to use GPMC in meaningful way, where some peripheral is connected
to the GPMC, you must create platform_device for the probe to happen
properly. Now all the devices I know so far, we have gpmc_smsc911x_init(),
omap_nand_flash_init(), etc...
These api's are getting called only through machine_desc.init_xxx callbacks,
And in case of DT, we have centralized machine_desc definition for all
platforms (board-generic.c). So even though you want to use GPMC for DT boot
mode, you can not make use of peripheral without changing board-files to
change to create platform_device.
Does it make sense?
Sure, if you are using one of the generic machine configurations for DT.
However, while this migration happens people may create their own custom
machine configurations for DT for testing things like smsc911x.
quoted
I am not convinced that this is addressing the underlying problem with
gpmc_mem_init().
The patch you submitted is cleanup patch and is required irrespective of
this patch. I believe this patch is just makes sure that, if you are booting
from DT and you do not have meaningful DT node for GPMC and peripheral
interfaced to it, no point in probing it.
Does it make any sense???
Yes, but do you also see the bug that is hiding in gpmc_mem_init()?
My point is to highlight this and not hide it, so that we can fix it
now. Otherwise if we wait until we enable the gpmc driver with DT and
this could hinder the DT migration later.
Jon
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 22:12:07, Hunter, Jon wrote:
On 10/18/2012 11:16 AM, Hiremath, Vaibhav wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 01:17:56, Hunter, Jon wrote:
quoted
On 10/15/2012 02:16 PM, Richard Cochran wrote:
quoted
From: hvaibhav@ti.com <redacted>
With recent changes in omap gpmc driver code, in case of DT
boot mode, where bootloader does not configure gpmc cs space
will result into kernel BUG() inside gpmc_mem_init() function,
as gpmc cs0 gpmc_config7[0].csvalid bit is set to '1' and
gpmc_config7[0].baseaddress is set to '0' on reset.
I am not sure I completely follow the logic here.
Won't this problem occur if the bootloader does not configure the gpmc
cs space AND we are not using DT?
That's what exactly the above comment describes.
Hmm ... you said "in the case of DT", but I am saying even "in the case
WITHOUT DT" this can happen. So I think the subject is mis-leading.
Ok, may be my above statement was confusing. But the bottom line is,
We should GPMC without any pre-configuration (either at u-boot or ROM) will
have this issue.
quoted
quoted
Is the csvalid bit set because we are booting from the internal ROM?
As per TRM, the reset value of the CS0_valis bit is set to 0. I have pasted
TRM statement below -
"Chip-select enable (reset value is 1 for CS[0] and 0 for CS[1-5])."
The above two sentences don't see to agree ...
Oops, it was typo mistake. I meant "is set to '1'"
quoted
And same applies to OMAP3 family of devices.
For which boot-modes? All or just the gpmc boot-modes?
That's reset value, and I believe it is applicable for all boot modes.
My omap3430 beagle has been booting with DT fine for some time and I
have not encountered this problem even on the latest kernel with the
gpmc driver present.
OMAp3430 beagle board has NAND flash available over GPMC-CS0 interface.
quoted
quoted
I guess I don't see why csvalid bit being set and a base-address of 0x0
should not be allowed. That should be a valid combination.
Yes, agreed.
quoted
One problem I see with gpmc_mem_init() is that it assumes that
BOOT_ROM_SPACE is 1MB for all devices starting at 0x0 apart from the
apollon board. For newer devices such as OMAP4, there is only 48KB of
internal ROM and only mapped to 0x0 when booting from internal ROM. So
this needs to be fixed.
How much internal ROM does the AM335x have and where is it mapped?
Does the boot ROM get mapped to 0x0, when booting from ROM?
I expect, it should be same as OMAP4.
quoted
quoted
quoted
This use-case is applicable for any board/EVM which doesn't have
any peripheral connected to gpmc cs0, for example BeagleXM and
BeagleBone, so DT boot mode fails.
This patch adds of_have_populated_dt() check before creating
device, so that for DT boot mode, gpmc probe will not be called
which is expected behavior, as gpmc is not supported yet from DT.
Yes, but we do actually still allow some platform devices to be probed
(such as dmtimers) when booting with DT that don't support DT yet. So
this change prevents us from using the gpmc on boards when booting with DT.
The idea here was,
In order to use GPMC in meaningful way, where some peripheral is connected
to the GPMC, you must create platform_device for the probe to happen
properly. Now all the devices I know so far, we have gpmc_smsc911x_init(),
omap_nand_flash_init(), etc...
These api's are getting called only through machine_desc.init_xxx callbacks,
And in case of DT, we have centralized machine_desc definition for all
platforms (board-generic.c). So even though you want to use GPMC for DT boot
mode, you can not make use of peripheral without changing board-files to
change to create platform_device.
Does it make sense?
Sure, if you are using one of the generic machine configurations for DT.
However, while this migration happens people may create their own custom
machine configurations for DT for testing things like smsc911x.
If we want to think about all such use-cases, then yes, this patch is not
required.
quoted
quoted
I am not convinced that this is addressing the underlying problem with
gpmc_mem_init().
The patch you submitted is cleanup patch and is required irrespective of
this patch. I believe this patch is just makes sure that, if you are booting
from DT and you do not have meaningful DT node for GPMC and peripheral
interfaced to it, no point in probing it.
Does it make any sense???
Yes, but do you also see the bug that is hiding in gpmc_mem_init()?
My point is to highlight this and not hide it, so that we can fix it
now. Otherwise if we wait until we enable the gpmc driver with DT and
this could hinder the DT migration later.
As I already mentioned in my previous response, your patch is required
irrespective of this patch. I would consider your patch as a cleanup patch.
Both the patches are independent, your patch is handling the error path
properly, whereas, my patch makes sure that you don't unnecessarily probe
GPMC if you are booting from DT and GPMC node is not present, as described
above.
Thanks,
Vaibhav
From: Jon Hunter <hidden> Date: 2012-10-18 18:30:31
On 10/18/2012 01:04 PM, Hiremath, Vaibhav wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 22:12:07, Hunter, Jon wrote:
...
quoted
Yes, but do you also see the bug that is hiding in gpmc_mem_init()?
My point is to highlight this and not hide it, so that we can fix it
now. Otherwise if we wait until we enable the gpmc driver with DT and
this could hinder the DT migration later.
As I already mentioned in my previous response, your patch is required
irrespective of this patch. I would consider your patch as a cleanup patch.
Both the patches are independent, your patch is handling the error path
properly, whereas, my patch makes sure that you don't unnecessarily probe
GPMC if you are booting from DT and GPMC node is not present, as described
above.
Your patch hides a bug. That's my point. How do you expect am335x ever
to support gpmc devices if this bug is not addressed?
So I think that you are over-simplifying it when you say that my patch
is just a clean-up patch. I agree that it is adding appropriate error
handling, but it also highlights the presence of a bug by allowing the
probe to fail.
Anyway, I don't care to debate this any further, we just need to fix
gpmc_mem_init().
Jon
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 00:00:31, Hunter, Jon wrote:
On 10/18/2012 01:04 PM, Hiremath, Vaibhav wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 22:12:07, Hunter, Jon wrote:
...
quoted
quoted
Yes, but do you also see the bug that is hiding in gpmc_mem_init()?
My point is to highlight this and not hide it, so that we can fix it
now. Otherwise if we wait until we enable the gpmc driver with DT and
this could hinder the DT migration later.
As I already mentioned in my previous response, your patch is required
irrespective of this patch. I would consider your patch as a cleanup patch.
Both the patches are independent, your patch is handling the error path
properly, whereas, my patch makes sure that you don't unnecessarily probe
GPMC if you are booting from DT and GPMC node is not present, as described
above.
Your patch hides a bug. That's my point. How do you expect am335x ever
to support gpmc devices if this bug is not addressed?
Jon,
May be my commit description was mis-leading to you.
I am not commenting anything on your bug-fix, but do not agree that it is
anything to do with hiding a bug.
I only agree with you on one point, if someone wants to change the board-
file to use GPMC with DT boot mode, then he will not be able to use it.
So I think that you are over-simplifying it when you say that my patch
is just a clean-up patch. I agree that it is adding appropriate error
handling, but it also highlights the presence of a bug by allowing the
probe to fail.
Anyway, I don't care to debate this any further,
Me neither...
we just need to fix
gpmc_mem_init().
Agreed, and that's what your patch rightly doing it.
Thanks,
Vaibhav
From: Jon Hunter <hidden> Date: 2012-10-18 18:46:18
On 10/18/2012 01:39 PM, Hiremath, Vaibhav wrote:
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 00:00:31, Hunter, Jon wrote:
quoted
On 10/18/2012 01:04 PM, Hiremath, Vaibhav wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 22:12:07, Hunter, Jon wrote:
...
quoted
quoted
Yes, but do you also see the bug that is hiding in gpmc_mem_init()?
My point is to highlight this and not hide it, so that we can fix it
now. Otherwise if we wait until we enable the gpmc driver with DT and
this could hinder the DT migration later.
As I already mentioned in my previous response, your patch is required
irrespective of this patch. I would consider your patch as a cleanup patch.
Both the patches are independent, your patch is handling the error path
properly, whereas, my patch makes sure that you don't unnecessarily probe
GPMC if you are booting from DT and GPMC node is not present, as described
above.
Your patch hides a bug. That's my point. How do you expect am335x ever
to support gpmc devices if this bug is not addressed?
Jon,
May be my commit description was mis-leading to you.
I am not commenting anything on your bug-fix, but do not agree that it is
anything to do with hiding a bug.
So we can agree is disagree on that ;-)
I only agree with you on one point, if someone wants to change the board-
file to use GPMC with DT boot mode, then he will not be able to use it.
quoted
So I think that you are over-simplifying it when you say that my patch
is just a clean-up patch. I agree that it is adding appropriate error
handling, but it also highlights the presence of a bug by allowing the
probe to fail.
Anyway, I don't care to debate this any further,
Me neither...
quoted
we just need to fix
gpmc_mem_init().
Agreed, and that's what your patch rightly doing it.
No. My patch does not fix the _actual_ bug, it is still there. Why do
you think that the probe is still failing for am335x? Without fixing it
am335x will never be able to support gpmc. So gpmc_mem_init() still
needs to be fixed.
Jon