Thread (24 messages) 24 messages, 5 authors, 2012-11-04

RE: [PATCH v3 06/10] net/macb: clean up ring buffer logic

From: David Laight <hidden>
Date: 2012-10-31 09:09:44
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, lkml

On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 4:12 AM, David Laight [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
Instead of masking head and tail every time we increment them, just let them
wrap through UINT_MAX and mask them when subscripting. Add simple accessor
functions to do the subscripting properly to minimize the chances of messing
this up.
...
quoted
+static unsigned int macb_tx_ring_avail(struct macb *bp)
+{
+     return TX_RING_SIZE - (bp->tx_head - bp->tx_tail);
+}
That one doesn't look quite right to me.
Surely it should be masking with 'TX_RING_SIZE - 1'
Why is that? head and tail can never be more than TX_RING_SIZE apart,
so it shouldn't make any difference.
It's a ring buffer (I presume) the pointers can be in either order.

	David
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help