On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 23:00 +0900, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 22:31:13 +0900
Akinobu Mita [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
Should this hash_table be converted from u16 hash_table[32] to
DECLARE_BITMAP(hash_table, 16 * 32) to ensure that it is aligned
on long-word boundary?
I think hash_table is already long-word aligned because it is placed
right after a pointer.
I recommend converting to proper bitmap. Because such an implicit
assumption is easily broken by someone touching this function.
Do you mean something like:
DECLARE_BITMAP(__hash_table, 16 * 32);
u16 *hash_table = (u16 *)__hash_table;
?
[...]
Could this driver perhaps use:
union hash_table {
DECLARE_BITMAP(bits, 16 * 32);
__le16 words[32];
};
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.