Re: [REGRESSION][PATCH V4 3/3] bpf jit: Let the powerpc jit handle negative offsets
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: 2012-04-30 04:30:15
Also in:
linuxppc-dev, lkml
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: 2012-04-30 04:30:15
Also in:
linuxppc-dev, lkml
On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 06:27 +0200, Jan Seiffert wrote:
Benjamin Herrenschmidt schrieb:quoted
On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 12:43 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:quoted
quoted
Matt's having a look at powerpcOk, he hasn't so I'll dig a bit. No obvious wrongness (but I'm not very familiar with bpf), though I do have a comment: sk_negative_common() and bpf_slow_path_common() should be made one and single macro which takes the fallback function as an argument.Ok, with the compile fix below it seems to work for me: (Feel free to fold that into the original patch)Should i resend the complete patch with the compile fix?
Won't hurt... BTW. Any idea about that bpf_program vs. sock_fprog issue I mentioned earlier ? Cheers, Ben.