Hi Dave,
quoted
Such a change will require rebase from all our developers and we already have
enough issues to solve, I don't wanna add one more here. Change what BT_*
stands for is ok, but there is no need to change the macros names.
I would never push back on Joe on a change like this, the way that
you are, and changes in my tree have an effect on 100 times more
people than your's.
You're being completely unreasonable, and I'm rather confident that in
response to what I'm saying you will simply start pulling more reasons
out of thin air simply because you just don't want the change and the
merge hassles.
I am actually fine with his reworked patchset, except the last patch
with the BT_DBG change. That will step on too many people toes right now
and I am also failing to see the benefit of that one.
Regards
Marcel