quoted
+ for (i = 0; i < GRETAP_BR_HASH_SIZE; i++) {
+ struct ipgre_tap_bridge_entry *entry;
+ struct hlist_node *h, *n;
+ hlist_for_each_entry_safe(entry, h, n,
+ &tunnel->hash[i], hlist)
+ {
+ unsigned long this_timer;
+ this_timer = entry->ageing_timer + delay;
+ if (time_before_eq(this_timer, jiffies))
+ ipgre_tap_bridge_delete(entry);
+ else if (time_before(this_timer, next_timer))
+ next_timer = this_timer;
+ }
+ }
+ spin_unlock_bh(&tunnel->hash_lock);
+ mod_timer(&tunnel->gc_timer, round_jiffies(next_timer + HZ/4));
wow... why setup a 250 ms timer, if entries are valid 300 seconds ?
Isn't that code trying to wakeup 250ms after the first expiry of any
of its items?
Do you even need a timer at all?
It may be enough to just put a timestamp into each entry
and tidy up when scanning one of the hash chains in (say)
the 'add item' path - when you need write access anyway.
A hash table might not be the best structure either!
The hash lookup is still o(n) for n >> table_size.
It also may be likely that you'll do repeated lookups for a small
number of items - in which case using a hash to cache recent lookups
might be useful (maybe with some type of balanced tree structure)
David