Re: [0/5] bcma/brcmsmac suspend/resume cleanups and fixes
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: 2012-01-13 16:15:42
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: 2012-01-13 16:15:42
2012/1/13 Rafał Miłecki [off-list ref]:
I have Asus netbook with BCM4313 since a week, so I'll able to test this. Just give me a day when I'm back home. Could we rearrange order of patches to make bcma: invalidate the mapped window over suspend/resume this first one and add stable as CC? What do you think about this?
I don't think it is relevant for stable - partly because in stable the
bcma suspend/resume isn't wired up anyway, but mostly because if that
patch really wants to make it into stable, it really is a different
patch than the one I munged it into. The stable bcma doesn't have
bcma_bus_suspend() at all, so it goes into that pci-specific one like
your original email had it, where it's a complete hack.
Does it fix anything in stable?
Linus