Re: [PATCH 1/5] bcma: convert suspend/resume to pm_ops
From: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
Date: 2012-01-13 10:01:17
W dniu 13 stycznia 2012 10:58 użytkownik Arend van Spriel [off-list ref] napisał:
On 01/13/2012 09:00 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:quoted
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 22:47:01 -0800 .. and avoid doing th eunnecessary PCI operations - the PCI layer will do them for us. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> --- drivers/bcma/host_pci.c | 38 +++++++++++++------------------------- 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/bcma/host_pci.c b/drivers/bcma/host_pci.c index 443b83a2fd7a..3aee641c9b7b 100644 --- a/drivers/bcma/host_pci.c +++ b/drivers/bcma/host_pci.c@@ -235,38 +235,27 @@ static void bcma_host_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *dev)} #ifdef CONFIG_PM -static int bcma_host_pci_suspend(struct pci_dev *dev, pm_message_t state) +static int bcma_suspend(struct device *dev)All functions in host_pci.c start with bcma_host_pci_ prefix. Can we stick to that convention?
/me agrees Would be nice -- Rafał