Re: 3.2-rc2+: Reported regressions from 3.0 and 3.1
flat view
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <hidden>
Date: 2011-11-29 20:09:39
Also in:
dri-devel, linux-acpi, linux-pm, linux-scsi, linux-wireless, lkml
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 07:34:28PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 01:04:14PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:quoted
This patch: commit d91ee5863b71e8c90eaf6035bff3078a85e2e7b5 Author: Len Brown [off-list ref] Date: Fri Apr 1 18:28:35 2011 -0400 cpuidle: replace xen access to x86 pm_idle and default_idle ..scribble on pm_idle and access default_idle, have it simply disable_cpuidle() so acpi_idle will not load and architecture default HLT will be used. idea was to have one call - disable_cpuidle() which would make pm_idle not be molested by other code. It disallows cpuidle_idle_call and acpi_idle_call to not set pm_idle (which is excellent). But thewhat is acpi_idle_call, I can't find it anywhere.
You are right. I had "acpi_idle_enter_*" and its friend in mind. Which are called from the cpuidle_idle_call. Let me fix that comment up.
quoted
amd_e400_idle and mwait_idle can still setup pm_idle which we really do not want.This is not the case: rather select_idle_routine()/idle_setup() sets pm_idle.
Yes. Let me fix up the comment.
[..]quoted
+bool set_pm_idle_to_default() +{ + if (!pm_idle) { + pm_idle = default_idle; + return true; + } + return false; +}I don't understand what you're trying to achieve here? Do you want default_idle to be always the pm_idle for xen or what is the deal here?
Yes (always want default_idle).
If yes, then simply do:
bool set_pm_idle_to_default(void) // remember to add "void" for no function args
{
bool ret = !!pm_idle;
pm_idle = default_idle;That would work too.
return ret; } ...quoted
void stop_this_cpu(void *dummy) { local_irq_disable();diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/setup.c b/arch/x86/xen/setup.c index 46d6d21..7506181 100644 --- a/arch/x86/xen/setup.c +++ b/arch/x86/xen/setup.c@@ -448,6 +448,6 @@ void __init xen_arch_setup(void) #endif disable_cpuidle(); boot_option_idle_override = IDLE_HALT; - + WARN_ON(!set_pm_idle_to_default());and then do WARN_ON(set_pm_idle_to_default()); instead of having arbitrary confusing logic. This way you can warn whether something else set pm_idle already. Or?
That would work as well.