Re: 3.2-rc2+: Reported regressions from 3.0 and 3.1

3.1-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 3.0 · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden> · 2011-08-28
Re: 3.1-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 3.0 · Dave Jones <hidden> · 2011-08-28
Re: 3.1-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 3.0 · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden> · 2011-08-28
Re: 3.1-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 3.0 · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> · 2011-08-28
3.2-rc2+: Reported regressions from 3.0 and 3.1 · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden> · 2011-11-21
Re: 3.2-rc2+: Reported regressions from 3.0 and 3.1 · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> · 2011-11-21
Re: 3.2-rc2+: Reported regressions from 3.0 and 3.1 · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> · 2011-11-21
Re: 3.2-rc2+: Reported regressions from 3.0 and 3.1 · Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> · 2011-11-21
Re: 3.2-rc2+: Reported regressions from 3.0 and 3.1 · Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> · 2011-11-22
Re: 3.2-rc2+: Reported regressions from 3.0 and 3.1 · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> · 2011-11-21
Re: 3.2-rc2+: Reported regressions from 3.0 and 3.1 · Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> · 2011-11-21
[PATCH] hugetlb: release pages in the error path of hugetlb_cow() (was: Re: 3.2-rc2+: Reported regressions from 3.0 and 3.1) · Michal Hocko <hidden> · 2011-11-28
Re: 3.2-rc2+: Reported regressions from 3.0 and 3.1 · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> · 2011-11-21
Re: 3.2-rc2+: Reported regressions from 3.0 and 3.1 · Ari Savolainen <hidden> · 2011-11-22
Re: 3.2-rc2+: Reported regressions from 3.0 and 3.1 · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> · 2011-11-21
Re: 3.2-rc2+: Reported regressions from 3.0 and 3.1 · Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> · 2011-11-23
Re: 3.2-rc2+: Reported regressions from 3.0 and 3.1 · Alex Deucher <hidden> · 2011-11-21
Re: 3.2-rc2+: Reported regressions from 3.0 and 3.1 · Srivatsa S. Bhat <hidden> · 2011-11-22
Re: 3.2-rc2+: Reported regressions from 3.0 and 3.1 · Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> · 2011-11-22
Re: 3.2-rc2+: Reported regressions from 3.0 and 3.1 · Andrea Arcangeli <hidden> · 2011-11-22
Re: 3.2-rc2+: Reported regressions from 3.0 and 3.1 · Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <hidden> · 2011-11-22
Re: 3.2-rc2+: Reported regressions from 3.0 and 3.1 · Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <hidden> · 2011-11-29
Re: 3.2-rc2+: Reported regressions from 3.0 and 3.1 · Borislav Petkov <hidden> · 2011-11-29
Re: 3.2-rc2+: Reported regressions from 3.0 and 3.1 · Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <hidden> · 2011-11-29
Re: 3.2-rc2+: Reported regressions from 3.0 and 3.1 · Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <hidden> · 2011-11-30
Re: 3.2-rc2+: Reported regressions from 3.0 and 3.1 · Borislav Petkov <hidden> · 2011-12-01
Re: 3.2-rc2+: Reported regressions from 3.0 and 3.1 · Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <hidden> · 2011-12-03
3.2-rc6+: Reported regressions from 3.0 and 3.1 · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden> · 2011-12-20
3.2-rc6+: Reported regressions from 3.0 and 3.1 · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden> · 2011-12-20
Re: 3.2-rc6+: Reported regressions from 3.0 and 3.1 · Markus Trippelsdorf <hidden> · 2011-12-21

From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <hidden>
Date: 2011-11-22 13:54:48
Also in: dri-devel, linux-acpi, linux-pm, linux-scsi, linux-wireless, lkml

Subject    : Regression in 3.1 causes Xen to use wrong idle routine
Submitter  : Stefan Bader [off-list ref]
Date       : 2011-10-26 10:24
Message-ID : 4EA7DFD1.9060608@canonical.com
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=131962467924564&w=2

The patch mentioned in http://mid.gmane.org/20111115144004.GE22675@phenom.dumpdata.com 
should do it. But the patch needs an Ack from ACPI/x86 folks.

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help