Thread (30 messages) 30 messages, 14 authors, 2011-12-21

Re: 3.2-rc2+: Reported regressions from 3.0 and 3.1

From: Andy Lutomirski <hidden>
Date: 2011-11-22 07:16:49
Also in: dri-devel, linux-acpi, linux-scsi, linux-wireless, lkml

On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Andy Lutomirski [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Linus Torvalds
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Subject    : [3.1 REGRESSION] Commit 5cec93c216db77c45f7ce970d46283bcb1933884 breaks the Chromium seccomp sandbox
Submitter  : Nix [off-list ref]
Date       : 2011-11-14 0:40
Message-ID : 8762inleno.fsf-AdTWujXS48Mg67Zj9sPl2A@public.gmane.org
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=132123396226377&w=2
This is apparently fixed in seccompsandbox.  See:

https://code.google.com/p/seccompsandbox/issues/detail?id=17
https://code.google.com/p/seccompsandbox/source/detail?r=178

Unless someone objects, I'll consider this to not be a kernel
regression worth fixing.

--Andy
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help