Thread (12 messages) flat view 12 messages, 8 authors, 2011-03-25

Re: [RFC] usbnet: use eth%d name for known ethernet devices

From: Michal Nazarewicz <hidden>
Date: 2011-03-23 23:17:57
Also in: lkml

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
@@ -97,6 +97,8 @@ struct driver_info {

 #define FLAG_LINK_INTR       0x0800          /* updates link (carrier) status */

+#define FLAG_PTP     0x1000          /* maybe use "usb%d" names */
quoted
quoted
quoted
On Wednesday 23 March 2011 19:46:50 Greg KH wrote:
quoted
"PTP"?  What does that stand for?
quoted
quoted
On Mar 23, 2011 8:36 PM, "Arnd Bergmann" [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
point-to-point, I'll improve the comment to spell it out when
I send the fixed version.
quoted
On Wednesday 23 March 2011 20:53:13 Michał Nazarewicz wrote:
quoted
I think P2P could be better.
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:57:18 +0100 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
quoted
Yes, good idea.
Randy Dunlap [off-list ref] writes:
that's peer-to-peer.

OTOH, I knew that PTP was point-to-point.
It can be any of that, depending on context.  For me PTP is more like
Picture Transport Protocol, whereas "2" between two letters is usually
"to".

Just my two cents though, no strong feelings or anything.

-- 
Best regards,                                          _     _
 .o. | Liege of Serenly Enlightened Majesty of       o' \,=./ `o
 ..o | Computer Science,  Michal "mina86" Nazarewicz    (o o)
 ooo +-<mina86-mina86.com>-<jid:mina86-jabber.org>--ooO--(_)--Ooo--

Attachments

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help